You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#1 2006-01-31 16:27:28
- thegnu
- Member
- From: Brooklyn, NY
- Registered: 2004-05-04
- Posts: 280
- Website
sdl_image vs. xf86-input-mouse naming convention
This is really a minor issue, but I just wanted to point out that, people, we should pick either underscores or hyphens. Because mixing them just gets confusing. I realize it can be really hard to make all package naming completely perfect, because of the whole problem where you have to kind of name a package after the application contained therein. But you know, it's just a thought.
I'm switching to Hyphen Linux: "We Have Our Package Naming Conventions Totally Under Control." 
Oh, and I'll say it first: "Yawn..." 
fffft!
Offline
#2 2006-01-31 23:14:45
- JGC
- Developer
- Registered: 2003-12-03
- Posts: 1,664
Re: sdl_image vs. xf86-input-mouse naming convention
The reason for this: it's following upstream stuff. xf86-input-mouse is named this way upstream, sdl_image is also named this way upstream.
Offline