You are not logged in.
Hi.
I am having a problem with update, if infinality-bundle
Last edited by dare023 (2014-12-15 18:21:44)
Offline
Not a Pacman issue, moving to AUR Issues...
Offline
Hi.
I am having a problem with update, if infinality-bundle repos are enabled, I get this error
sudo pacman -Syy
error: infinality-bundle: signature from "bohoomil (dev key) <bohoomil@zoho.com>" is unknown trust
error: infinality-bundle-multilib: signature from "bohoomil (dev key) <bohoomil@zoho.com>" is unknown trust
:: Synchronizing package databases...
core 122.1 KiB 1628K/s 00:00 [####################################################] 100%
extra 1806.1 KiB 1754K/s 00:01 [####################################################] 100%
community 2.4 MiB 1756K/s 00:01 [####################################################] 100%
multilib 121.9 KiB 1625K/s 00:00 [####################################################] 100%
archlinuxfr 20.4 KiB 377K/s 00:00 [####################################################] 100%
repo-ck 45.3 KiB 225K/s 00:00 [####################################################] 100%
infinality-bundle 9.8 KiB 1957K/s 00:00 [####################################################] 100%
infinality-bundle.sig 287.0 B 0.00B/s 00:00 [####################################################] 100%
error: infinality-bundle: signature from "bohoomil (dev key) <bohoomil@zoho.com>" is unknown trust
error: failed to update infinality-bundle (invalid or corrupted database (PGP signature))
infinality-bundle-multilib 2.5 KiB 0.00B/s 00:00 [####################################################] 100%
infinality-bundle-multilib.sig 287.0 B 0.00B/s 00:00 [####################################################] 100%
error: infinality-bundle-multilib: signature from "bohoomil (dev key) <bohoomil@zoho.com>" is unknown trust
error: failed to update infinality-bundle-multilib (invalid or corrupted database (PGP signature))
error: database 'infinality-bundle' is not valid (invalid or corrupted database (PGP signature))
error: database 'infinality-bundle-multilib' is not valid (invalid or corrupted database (PGP signature))I have done what was suggested on home page, with no errors.
I have also tried to reset keys,and then to import again - but failed, cant import keys.
I did not change anything related to keys, only imported these.
Since there was similar topic, now closed as it was not related to Arch I will place my uname -a to avoid confusion ![]()
uname -a
Linux desktop 3.17.6-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Dec 7 23:43:32 UTC 2014 x86_64 GNU/LinuxAny idea?
Thanks in advance.
Offline
Are you referring to these comments?
EDIT: I see you've opened another thread on the same issue. Can we please keep to just one thread please?
Last edited by clfarron4 (2014-12-15 18:10:16)
Claire is fine.
Problems? I have dysgraphia, so clear and concise please.
My public GPG key for package signing
My x86_64 package repository
Offline
Not a Pacman Issue, moving to AUR Issues (and please don't cross post).
Offline
Not a Pacman Issue, moving to AUR Issues (and please don't cross post).
I am sorry for missing a place for post.
How is this aur issue, I have repos in pacman, installed all with pacman etc. ?
Offline
OK, so I'm going to throw in again with the advice from the ArchLinux news page, because I had this with my own PGP key just now, re-did the steps on the news page and voilà, it's working again.
EDIT:
jasonwryan wrote:Not a Pacman Issue, moving to AUR Issues (and please don't cross post).
I am sorry for missing a place for post.
How is this aur issue, I have repos in pacman, installed all with pacman etc. ?
Q: Isn't this an unofficial key you're trying to add here? If it is, then I'd have thought that this page on adding unofficial keys applies?
Last edited by clfarron4 (2014-12-15 18:21:21)
Claire is fine.
Problems? I have dysgraphia, so clear and concise please.
My public GPG key for package signing
My x86_64 package repository
Offline
Tried again, now works.
Strange.
Offline
How is this aur issue, I have repos in pacman, installed all with pacman etc. ?
unofficial repos are very often based on AUR packages that someone has build to make installing them easier.
All the caveats / downsides of using aur packages tend to apply to unofficial repos also.
Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.
clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky
Offline