Problems with Imlib - MIT-SHM & Enlightenment

sud_crow · 2003-12-24 05:01:43

Actually is more like an issue

As soon as i start x i get this message from Enlightenment:

So i looked around and found that i can enable the option with imlib_config, here is the shot:

As you can see there is the option MIT-SHM Shared Memory Enabled so i tick it, and then save the things (did it as root and i get an extra button to save as "system settings" and as "user settings" also)

But when i restart Enlightenment the warning shows again and if i run imlib_config i see it de-activated again (the MIT thing).

Some help please?[/i]

dp · 2004-01-16 00:25:15

same for me, sorry no help --- no idea why this happenes :-(

sarah31 · 2004-01-16 01:28:40

sud crow mentioned how he fixed this in another thread. i have filed a bug on this already. i don't use E but it is now a very long standing issue (first report of this problem from june of last year)

sarah31 · 2004-01-17 06:12:28

imlib has bee rebuilt please install the new package to see if the bug persists.

sud_crow · 2004-01-20 06:13:14

I will try it a soon as i get home (in a couple of weeks that is).

dp · 2004-01-20 08:40:28

mit-shm errors do not come up longer (do not use e as default ... maybe longtermuse shows something different)

rayzorblayde · 2004-01-20 15:32:44

dp wrote:

mit-shm errors do not come up longer (do not use e as default ... maybe longtermuse shows something different)

coudl you elaborate a little more? i'm not understanding what you are saying

dp · 2004-01-20 17:45:35

rayzorblayde wrote:

dp wrote:
mit-shm errors do not come up longer (do not use e as default ... maybe longtermuse shows something different)
coudl you elaborate a little more? i'm not understanding what you are saying

enlightment is running now fine and if you enable mit-shm in imlib-config, it stays enabled --- sorry my english

rayzorblayde · 2004-01-21 03:28:51

dp wrote:

rayzorblayde wrote:
dp wrote:
mit-shm errors do not come up longer (do not use e as default ... maybe longtermuse shows something different)
coudl you elaborate a little more? i'm not understanding what you are saying
enlightment is running now fine and if you enable mit-shm in imlib-config, it stays enabled --- sorry my english

it's all good

i thought you were trying to tell us not to use E as a default WM, but i understand you now.

dp · 2004-01-21 08:06:50

rayzorblayde wrote:

dp wrote:
rayzorblayde wrote:
coudl you elaborate a little more? i'm not understanding what you are saying
enlightment is running now fine and if you enable mit-shm in imlib-config, it stays enabled --- sorry my english
it's all good
i thought you were trying to tell us not to use E as a default WM, but i understand you now.

no ... ... "I, ME, MYSELF, MY EGO" do not uses e for daily work, that's what i wanted to express, sorry for missunderstanding :-)

Arch Linux

#1 2003-12-24 05:01:43

Problems with Imlib - MIT-SHM & Enlightenment

#2 2004-01-16 00:25:15

Re: Problems with Imlib - MIT-SHM & Enlightenment

#3 2004-01-16 01:28:40

Re: Problems with Imlib - MIT-SHM & Enlightenment

#4 2004-01-17 06:12:28

Re: Problems with Imlib - MIT-SHM & Enlightenment

#5 2004-01-20 06:13:14

Re: Problems with Imlib - MIT-SHM & Enlightenment

#6 2004-01-20 08:40:28

Re: Problems with Imlib - MIT-SHM & Enlightenment

#7 2004-01-20 15:32:44

Re: Problems with Imlib - MIT-SHM & Enlightenment

#8 2004-01-20 17:45:35

Re: Problems with Imlib - MIT-SHM & Enlightenment

#9 2004-01-21 03:28:51

Re: Problems with Imlib - MIT-SHM & Enlightenment

#10 2004-01-21 08:06:50

Re: Problems with Imlib - MIT-SHM & Enlightenment

Board footer