You are not logged in.

#1 2016-11-14 09:32:10

jf25
Member
From: Germany
Registered: 2015-07-11
Posts: 35

cjs downgrade

Hello,
when doing pacman -Syu today, pacman warned me, that my version of cjs (3.2.0-1) was greater than the cjs version in the community repository (3.0.1-2). First I ignored that, with the result that Cinnamon crashed on login. Then I downgraded cjs to 3.0.1-2. Now everything works fine again. But is there any official information why the package has been downgraded? I can't remember such a downgrade has happened before.
Thanks.

Last edited by jf25 (2016-11-14 09:32:55)

Offline

#2 2016-11-14 11:20:38

x33a
Forum Fellow
Registered: 2009-08-15
Posts: 4,587

Re: cjs downgrade

This is very weird. Looking at the package log at https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/comm … ckages/cjs, it doesn't seem that it was downgraded, but on the package page, the version is indeed 3.0.1-2.

https://www.archlinux.org/packages/comm … 86_64/cjs/

Even if there's a reason for a downgrade, it shouldn't be done without adding an epoch. Are you using the testing repo?

Offline

#3 2016-11-14 11:35:52

WorMzy
Forum Moderator
From: Scotland
Registered: 2010-06-16
Posts: 11,865
Website

Re: cjs downgrade

I can only hazard a guess here, but I suspect the maintainer pushed an update through during readline 7.0 update. So a rebuild (3.0.1-2) was pushed to staging/, then the maintainer pushed an update (3.2.0-1) directly to community/, then all of staging/ was pushed through. Looks like a couple of bug reports have been opened about cinnamon and the readline update, so keep an eye on those.

https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/51816
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/51817


Sakura:-
Mobo: MSI MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX // Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X @4.9GHz // GFX: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT // RAM: 32GB (4x 8GB) Corsair DDR4 (@ 3000MHz) // Storage: 1x 3TB HDD, 6x 1TB SSD, 2x 120GB SSD, 1x 275GB M2 SSD

Making lemonade from lemons since 2015.

Offline

#4 2016-11-14 11:45:47

Yaau
Member
From: 52°22'21.6"N 9°43'24.6"E
Registered: 2016-11-14
Posts: 8

Re: cjs downgrade

Hi there,

---------don't use this workaround --------------------
I've just had the same problem. Cinnamon crashes beacause "libread.so.6" can't be found. First I used a symbolic link from libreadline.so.6 to libreadline.so.7.0 to correct this problem. But now pacman wants to downgrade cjs again from Version 3.2.0-1 to 3.0.1-2. I downgraded it again now, everything seems to work again. But it's strange update behaviour.
---------don't use this workaround --------------------

Last edited by Yaau (2016-11-14 12:08:13)

Offline

#5 2016-11-14 11:57:35

WorMzy
Forum Moderator
From: Scotland
Registered: 2010-06-16
Posts: 11,865
Website

Re: cjs downgrade

I used a symbolic link from libread.so.6 to libread.so.7.0 to correct this problem

Don't do that. libread.so.7 is called that because it isn't the same as libread.so.6. Read up on soname bumps and why they happen.


Sakura:-
Mobo: MSI MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX // Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X @4.9GHz // GFX: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT // RAM: 32GB (4x 8GB) Corsair DDR4 (@ 3000MHz) // Storage: 1x 3TB HDD, 6x 1TB SSD, 2x 120GB SSD, 1x 275GB M2 SSD

Making lemonade from lemons since 2015.

Offline

#6 2016-11-14 12:05:46

Yaau
Member
From: 52°22'21.6"N 9°43'24.6"E
Registered: 2016-11-14
Posts: 8

Re: cjs downgrade

Yes but I needed a short time solution. Meanwhile I changed it back, after downgrade. Sorry didn't want to promote a dirty workaround.

Offline

#7 2016-11-14 12:24:59

WorMzy
Forum Moderator
From: Scotland
Registered: 2010-06-16
Posts: 11,865
Website

Re: cjs downgrade

Fair enough. A better workaround would be to extract the .so.6 libraries from an older version of the package. e.g. readline-6.3.008-4-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz. This isn't a long term solution, but should work in the interim.

EDIT: make sure to remove the .so.6 libraries after cjs/cinnamon is fixed.

Last edited by WorMzy (2016-11-14 14:56:35)


Sakura:-
Mobo: MSI MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX // Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X @4.9GHz // GFX: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT // RAM: 32GB (4x 8GB) Corsair DDR4 (@ 3000MHz) // Storage: 1x 3TB HDD, 6x 1TB SSD, 2x 120GB SSD, 1x 275GB M2 SSD

Making lemonade from lemons since 2015.

Offline

#8 2016-11-14 17:16:28

jf25
Member
From: Germany
Registered: 2015-07-11
Posts: 35

Re: cjs downgrade

x33a wrote:

Even if there's a reason for a downgrade, it shouldn't be done without adding an epoch. Are you using the testing repo?

Nope, never had testing enabled. The history of cjs on my computer is as follows:
3.0.1-1 -> 3.2.0-1 -> 3.0.1-2

Looking at the git-log, it seems as there will be a cjs 3.2.0-2 soon. Still pretty strange, though. Shouldn't there be other users who made the same experience as I did?

Offline

#9 2016-11-14 17:18:31

Scimmia
Fellow
Registered: 2012-09-01
Posts: 11,560

Re: cjs downgrade

There are, a number of people on IRC and numerous bug reports.

Edit: looks like this has been taken care of.

Last edited by Scimmia (2016-11-14 17:36:08)

Offline

#10 2016-11-15 07:48:31

djsheva
Member
Registered: 2016-11-15
Posts: 4

Re: cjs downgrade

Yaau wrote:

Yes but I needed a short time solution. Meanwhile I changed it back, after downgrade. Sorry didn't want to promote a dirty workaround.

Hi! Short solution here can be downgrading cinnamon version.

Try "yaourt cinnamon" and install packages from "antegros" (lower version), not "community"

Offline

#11 2016-11-15 08:12:41

jasonwryan
Anarchist
From: .nz
Registered: 2009-05-09
Posts: 30,424
Website

Re: cjs downgrade

djsheva wrote:
Yaau wrote:

Yes but I needed a short time solution. Meanwhile I changed it back, after downgrade. Sorry didn't want to promote a dirty workaround.

Hi! Short solution here can be downgrading cinnamon version.

Try "yaourt cinnamon" and install packages from "antegros" (lower version), not "community"

Antegros is a separate distro: we only support Arch. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Co … pport_ONLY


Arch + dwm   •   Mercurial repos  •   Surfraw

Registered Linux User #482438

Offline

#12 2016-11-15 08:43:44

Yaau
Member
From: 52°22'21.6"N 9°43'24.6"E
Registered: 2016-11-14
Posts: 8

Re: cjs downgrade

Hi thx for your reply,

but I'm not going to downgrade packages which are working correctly for several days (cinnamon) and I'm definitely not mixing up packages of different Distros as a workaround (even if they are both arch "based"). Meanwhile the problem was fixed (cjs got updatet again), no workarounds are needed anymore.

Last edited by Yaau (2016-11-15 08:44:48)

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB