libMXF.so

Truggleswick · 2017-03-30 19:06:53

Hey ppl

I'm trying to get Blackmagic's DaVinci Resolve installed, from their Fedora package.

I've got stuck on...

"error while loading shared libraries: libMXF.so"

As far as I can rather, it's an old video codec?

Against my better judgement, I installed this...

http://ingex.sourceforge.net/libMXF/

...but, no joy!

Any ideas?

jasonwryan · 2017-03-30 19:21:16

Moving to AUR Issues...

Trilby · 2017-03-30 19:56:53

What is "Blackmagic's DaVinci Resolve" where are you getting it from, and how are you trying to install it? Giving us a single line of an error message with no context of what command led to that error is meaningless.

Did you compile the software? Or did you litterally just unpack an rpm? If you unpacked the rpm, why are you guessing about the dependency that's missing, the spec file lists the dependencies.

Truggleswick · 2017-03-30 20:21:39

Sorry. I'm no good at this debugging stuff. Casual user/web-dev.

It's video editing software. Better than lightworks apparently.

You download a zip here....

https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/produc … nciresolve

...which is a package for Fedora. Contains a sh file.

This person got it running on Manjaro...

https://forum.blackmagicdesign.com/view … 8&start=50

with...

$ yaourt -S gstreamer0.10
$ pacman -S opencl-nvidia openssl
$ unzip DaVinci_Resolve_12.5.5_Linux.zip
$ sudo ./DaVinci_Resolve_12.5.5_Linux.sh
$ sudo bash && cd /opt/resolve/libs
# ln -s /usr/lib/libssl.so libssl.so.10
# ln -s /usr/lib/libcrypto.so libcrypto.so.10

then...

/opt/resolve/bin/resolve

...to run it. When I tried to run it, it asked for libcudart.so.7.5

I installed cuda 7.5 from AUR to fix that.

Next error was this libMXF.so

I'm not desperate for this. I could always just dual-boot into Fedora, but I love my arch.

Trilby · 2017-03-30 20:48:25

Why do you say that is a package for fedora if it only contains a .sh file. Fedora uses .rpm packages. RPMs, even if for closed source projects, will list the dependencies.

Truggleswick · 2017-03-30 20:54:46

From one of the Blackmagic guys....

"At release we support CentOS and RHEL 7.3 and have little testing of other distributions"

poio · 2017-04-19 12:17:42

I went through the exact same process and also got stuck on libMXF.so not being found.

Did you manage to get it to work?

Truggleswick · 2017-04-19 12:19:46

No. Tho I can't say I've tried messing with it again since that last post

V1del · 2017-04-19 14:12:49

The libraries it doesn't find are all part of the libraries it ships with, you might want to try and add /opt/resolve/libs to ld.conf(.d)

poio · 2017-04-19 19:11:08

I managed to get it working!

First off, after I ran the install script it didnt copy the libs/ LUT/ and Developer/ folders to /opt/resolve, so i ran the install script with the --keep option (as described here https://forum.blackmagicdesign.com/view … 0#p327053) which created a Resolve.2053919925/ folder in the same folder as the install script (as opposed to whats described in the link). From there i copied the missing folders to /opt/resolve.

Secondly I also had to extract (tar -xvf file) all tarballs in /opt/resolve/libs/, this will solve the libMXF.so issue along with other missing libs.

Thirdly I just followed the instructions here https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments … 5/df65lr4/ and then it worked.

Hope this helps

Last edited by poio (2017-04-19 19:11:28)

Arch Linux

#1 2017-03-30 19:06:53

libMXF.so

#2 2017-03-30 19:21:16

Re: libMXF.so

#3 2017-03-30 19:56:53

Re: libMXF.so

#4 2017-03-30 20:21:39

Re: libMXF.so

#5 2017-03-30 20:48:25

Re: libMXF.so

#6 2017-03-30 20:54:46

Re: libMXF.so

#7 2017-04-19 12:17:42

Re: libMXF.so

#8 2017-04-19 12:19:46

Re: libMXF.so

#9 2017-04-19 14:12:49

Re: libMXF.so

#10 2017-04-19 19:11:08

Re: libMXF.so

Board footer