You are not logged in.

#1 2006-07-06 22:33:33

Lone_Wolf
Member
From: Netherlands, Europe
Registered: 2005-10-04
Posts: 11,911

Soundfont need extracting tool - separate package or not

I have found a nice soundfont on the net and have started a package to install it so timidity++ can use it.

This soundfont is in a compressed format (sfark) and a binary application is necessary to extract it to make it usable for timidity++.

Arch has no package for that binary application.

Is it ok to write a separate package for it and have the soundfont package depend on another AUR package ?


Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.


(A works at time B)  && (time C > time B ) ≠  (A works at time C)

Offline

#2 2006-07-06 22:52:16

Snowman
Developer/Forum Fellow
From: Montreal, Canada
Registered: 2004-08-20
Posts: 5,212

Re: Soundfont need extracting tool - separate package or not

Yes, write a seperate package for the extracting app.  That way, other users will be able to use it to create other soundfont PKGBUILD.

Offline

#3 2006-07-07 20:14:22

Lone_Wolf
Member
From: Netherlands, Europe
Registered: 2005-10-04
Posts: 11,911

Re: Soundfont need extracting tool - separate package or not

Thank you, Snowman.
I've made a package and copied the license from the website.
I hope to test it this weekend and will then submit it to the AUR.


Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.


(A works at time B)  && (time C > time B ) ≠  (A works at time C)

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB