You are not logged in.

#1 2018-04-01 23:55:15

vicentereyes
Member
Registered: 2017-02-17
Posts: 5

[SOLVED] package with a 3 day lifespan

I have a package (libcloudproviders) don't remember installing, and I'm not the only one who has it. The following two forum threads post their package list and you can find libcloudproviders by Ctrl-F-ing:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=235692
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=235771
the curious thing is it doesn't exist:
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sor … dproviders
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?K=libcloudproviders

Anyway. According to pacman.log I installed it March 28th and it was installed as a dependency for another package.

Does this happen frequently?

Last edited by vicentereyes (2018-04-02 00:54:01)

Offline

#2 2018-04-02 00:09:56

Scimmia
Fellow
Registered: 2012-09-01
Posts: 11,564

Re: [SOLVED] package with a 3 day lifespan

It was added in November. A package existing for 4+ months is nothing shocking or extreme.

Offline

#3 2018-04-02 00:53:43

vicentereyes
Member
Registered: 2017-02-17
Posts: 5

Re: [SOLVED] package with a 3 day lifespan

Now that I think about it, I reinstalled arch the 28th, which makes my original post really stupid. Thanks

Offline

#4 2018-04-02 01:20:41

dakota
Member
Registered: 2016-05-20
Posts: 280

Re: [SOLVED] package with a 3 day lifespan

vicentereyes wrote:

Does this happen frequently?

I don't know.

According to my pacman log, it was installed on my system on 3/24 as a result of 'pacman -Syu'. I noticed it today when running 'pacman -Qm'.  I removed it with 'pacman -Rns $(pacman -Qtdq)'.

It may not be shocking or extreme, but it does seem weird. wink


"Before Enlightenment chop wood, carry water. After Enlightenment chop wood, carry water." -- Zen proverb

Offline

#5 2018-04-03 20:49:28

Lone_Wolf
Forum Moderator
From: Netherlands, Europe
Registered: 2005-10-04
Posts: 11,925

Re: [SOLVED] package with a 3 day lifespan


Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.


(A works at time B)  && (time C > time B ) ≠  (A works at time C)

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB