You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Hi, I've installed the MS fonts following those instructions:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Microsoft_fonts (from ISO)
All went fine but the chat, console and some other fonts dont look identical to the Windows version.
$ fc-match Verdana
verdana.ttf: "Verdana" "Regular"
Other fonts seem to work correctly though.
Offline
You will never be able to get your fonts to look identical to Windows because they are rendered by a different program. Linux uses freetype/opentype and Windows uses cleartype. So, the best you can do is mess around with fontconfig to enable antialiasing and stuff like that.
Offline
You will never be able to get your fonts to look identical to Windows because they are rendered by a different program. Linux uses freetype/opentype and Windows uses cleartype. So, the best you can do is mess around with fontconfig to enable antialiasing and stuff like that.
Alright, thanks. So that means in theory the fonts are all working correctly, right?
Offline
Yes, the fonts are most likely working correctly. I wish I had better news, but since cleartype is not open source, there is really no way for linux software to render exactly like Windows fonts, even when using the same font.
Offline
Yes, the fonts are most likely working correctly. I wish I had better news, but since cleartype is not open source, there is really no way for linux software to render exactly like Windows fonts, even when using the same font.
Thanks again, for clearing up.
Offline
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Fo … _rendering - though there's quite a debate on whether that's actually an improvement ;-)
Just to be sure: this is a rendering issue, you do not see a completely different, garbled, pixelated, … font? (screenshots?)
Offline
https://i.imgur.com/HeU7GIX.png
https://i.imgur.com/wvWXgKH.png
https://i.imgur.com/YDljIuj.png
https://i.imgur.com/mu2RWr7.png
chat looks pretty unclear to me, not sure if the Verdana font is actually being used, though some things look a bit better AFAIK
Moderator edit: Converted over sized images to url links
Last edited by ewaller (2018-08-26 16:05:22)
Offline
Donatello4620,
Please review https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Co … s_and_code
Nothing is too wonderful to be true, if it be consistent with the laws of nature -- Michael Faraday
The shortest way to ruin a country is to give power to demagogues.— Dionysius of Halicarnassus
---
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way
Offline
That's not Verdana (look at the "a" and the "y") - the console says Nimbus Sans and on a brief check, that fits.
I don't know how to make TF2 use a different font, but you might configure Sans to default to Verdana, if you don't mind. See eg. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Fo … ault_fonts
Offline
That's not Verdana (look at the "a" and the "y") - the console says Nimbus Sans and on a brief check, that fits.
I don't know how to make TF2 use a different font, but you might configure Sans to default to Verdana, if you don't mind. See eg. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Fo … ault_fonts
Strange, because in the console it said something about verdana aswell (not in the screenshot)
Offline
Maybe some interesting error message regarding the font? Anyway, the font shown in those screenshots is not Verdana - that's no "misrendering", the glyphs have different shapes (Verdana is straighter)
Offline
Maybe some interesting error message regarding the font? Anyway, the font shown in those screenshots is not Verdana - that's no "misrendering", the glyphs have different shapes (Verdana is straighter)
Well looks like console isn't saying anything about Verdana anymore, yesterday I got the following messages in the console though:
m_face->glyph->bitmap.width is 0 for ch:32 Verdana
Offline
Pages: 1