Arch Linux

brody_x

Member

Registered: 2019-11-14

Posts: 2

pysolfc doesn't start after update 2.6.4-2

hello

my guilty pleasure solitaire didn't start after today update

getting the error:

  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/pysollib/mfxutil.py", line 146, in <module>           
    uclock = time.clock   

I found:

The function time.clock() has been removed, after having been deprecated since Python 3.3: use time.perf_counter() or time.process_time() instead, depending on your requirements, to have well-defined behavior. (Contributed by Matthias Bussonnier in bpo-36895.)

I edited "/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/pysollib/mfxutil.py" and tried both and both functions are working - I don't have an idea, which function does really meet the requirements for the program - so it is just a dirty workaround
nevertheless, a hint would be nice

and at last, it is late and I know, there is a professional way to post a bug, hopefully nexttime I have learned to post a bug the ARCH way - of course i am happy about any hint from you

merlock

Member

Registered: 2018-10-30

Posts: 262

Re: pysolfc doesn't start after update 2.6.4-2

Reported on pysol's github page.

---

Eenie meenie, chili beanie, the spirits are about to speak -- Bullwinkle J. Moose
It's a big club...and you ain't in it -- George Carlin
Registered Linux user #149839
perl -e 'print$i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10); '

brody_x

Member

Registered: 2019-11-14

Posts: 2

Re: pysolfc doesn't start after update 2.6.4-2

Reported on pysol's github page.

ok - Thank You

Stefan Husmann

Member

From: Germany

Registered: 2007-08-07

Posts: 1,391

Re: pysolfc doesn't start after update 2.6.4-2

The Pysolfx developer said this has been fixed in git, and Arcjh Linux should use a downstream patch, whatever that means.

As a workaround: Look at aisleriot, it is very similar.

Lone_Wolf

Administrator

From: Netherlands, Europe

Registered: 2005-10-04

Posts: 15,396

Re: pysolfc doesn't start after update 2.6.4-2

https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/64554 mentions the fix.
The maintainer can add that commit as a patch, maybe voting for that issue will help to speed things up.

---

Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.

clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky