You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Hi,
I'm new to Arch.
I installed a costum kernel without ABS.
I downloaded the sources from kernel.org and extracted them to /usr/src/linux-2.6.17.13 and then:
cd /usr/src
ln -s linux-2.6.17.13 linux
cd linux
make menuconfig
make && make modules_install
cp arch/i386/boot/bzImage /boot/kernel-2.6.17.13
cp .config /boot/config-2.6.17.13
cp System.map /boot/System.map-2.6.17.13
and updated grub.conf
my question:
Will the System.map-2.6.17.13 be found by Arch or must I name it System.map26 ?
I used Gentoo and there the System.map is searched/found by /boot/System.map-`uname-r`. How is it in Arch?
Offline
Why did you not use ABS?
Anyways the PKGBUILD from ABS has this line:
cp System.map $startdir/pkg/boot/System.map26
So I think that means name it System.map26 .
[img]http://www.barbarawood.com/guestbook/images/smilies/koolaid.gif[/img]
"Ooooh Yaaaa!"
Offline
Why did you not use ABS?
I don't understand it yet
And I often change the config or try new kernel-versions, so the "good-old-way" is easer for me ... just download, extract, configure and build it...
hmm, I want to keep the old kernel, so that I can boot if the custom kernel fails...
So naming the System.map of my Costum-kernel "System.map26" is not a good idea...
edit:
from the the "Kernel Prototype PKGBUILD"
The generated package will have the following properties:
...
# vmlinuz-$_kerver-$_extraver-$_patchset-$_cfgname
# System.map-$_kerver-$_extraver-$_patchset-$_cfgname
# kconfig-$_kerver-$_extraver-$_patchset-$_cfgname[/b]
...
...
# create unique names in /boot/
cp System.map $startdir/pkg/boot/System.map-$_idstr
cp arch/i386/boot/bzImage $startdir/pkg/boot/vmlinuz-$_idstr
...
...
does that mean my namings are ok?
I think so, or not?
Offline
As long as every system.map has a unique name, it doesn't matter what you call them. The system.map contains verioning info, so any app that comes looking for system.map will select the one that matches your running kernel.
So yes - your naming scheme is OK.
Offline
fine
Offline
Pages: 1