[solved] Cannot save AUR profile - The PGP key fingerprint is invalid

Lockheed · 2021-04-22 19:21:08

What am I supposed to paste into SSH Public Key in my AUR profile?

I get "The PGP key fingerprint is invalid"
when I put in result of cat ~/.ssh/aur

Last edited by Lockheed (2021-04-24 07:19:39)

progandy · 2021-04-22 20:08:15

If you called your private key "aur", then the public key you need to enter is in "aur.pub".

Lockheed · 2021-04-22 20:33:07

Thanks, but I am getting the same error.
aur.pub starts with ssh-rsa. My old one was starting with ssh-dss

trout · 2021-04-22 20:33:08

Are there line breaks in your key?

Last edited by trout (2021-04-22 20:33:50)

Lockheed · 2021-04-22 20:39:56

I don't think so. Can someone paste a scrambled example of how the pasted value should look like?

Last edited by Lockheed (2021-04-22 20:47:25)

trout · 2021-04-22 20:57:11

I'm on a Windows PC right now and generated this through PuTTYGen, but the format should be the same as the authorized_keys file and is as follows (note: this is a freshly generated demo):

ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAABJQAAAQEA2YSnwqAcwIPrBoZkG/dPxyaLM6xiFSY28R9TvTaMFOi7aqDBWgi5ZcKcMITGdBXeRlT2w0yeTANk67l31r0XncJKS/pGpkvfusSDoxxlPkbTP37vBB4bNCTWLU63+eV62ltYFRiir56lkryhJ2hIIbwqz9XPSeYG3DRawfQFng8Oo0C8FUae7kuO1Qq5yZ0dCoA7LRFk9fqedOITDSWhzS3BPeR7+VOH4IAttGzOYlKMTjTKOV4Lrm3qVVHAnxCComVGu42aE65cIu09q90/ExZ/7n+QH2Fi3PM6mv2tdzWyZPJRMhcbwbsY3iCTqy5eV2mzlVOL0T1Fxm86yUUX6w== demo

Lockheed · 2021-04-22 21:00:10

Looks like mine. Is that a username (demo)on the end? My file ends with username@host but whether I leave it or remove it, it won't save.

eschwartz · 2021-04-22 21:06:35

The whitespace-separated word at the end is a comment, and does not matter.

Considering that ssh public keys do not contain sensitive info (they are needed by the server, not by you, the only thing you can do with a pubkey is allow the privkey's owner to prove they generated the pubkey and therefore get to log in), you could try posting the exact text you tried inputting to the AUR.

Lockheed · 2021-04-22 21:08:34

ssh-rsa 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

schard · 2021-04-22 21:39:13

Your key is broken.

0 ✓ rne@envy ~ $ cat ssh.pub 
ssh-rsa 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
0 ✓ rne@envy ~ $ ssh-keygen -lf ssh.pub 
ssh.pub is not a public key file.

Consider generating a new keypair.

eschwartz · 2021-04-22 21:42:44

The AUR validates the pubkey as invalid (strict mode) base64.

$ ssh-keygen -l -f /tmp/lockheed.pub
/tmp/lockheed.pub is not a public key file.

Dunno what you did to that string, but ssh doesn't like it at all.

EDIT: ninjaed...

Last edited by eschwartz (2021-04-22 21:43:09)

Lockheed · 2021-04-22 21:47:59

I think it's because I removed the user part. Here's the whole one:

ssh-rsa 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 juha@panzor

schard · 2021-04-22 23:15:13

No it is not. And given the commands above, you could have tested that yourself.
And quite frankly I tend to assume trolling here, since an 11-year Arch veteran with over 1,400 posts on these boards should know how to manage SSH keys and use the AUR.

eschwartz wrote:

Why are you being an asshole? [...]

I don't know. It was late and I probably got more triggered by the last post than I should have.
That was uncalled for and I apologise.

Last edited by schard (2021-04-23 09:49:35)

eschwartz · 2021-04-23 00:55:41

schard wrote:

No it is not. And given the commands above, you could have tested that yourself.
And quite frankly I tend to assume trolling here, since an 11-year Arch veteran with over 1,400 posts on these boards should know how to manage SSH keys and use the AUR.

Why are you being an asshole? What does being an arch veteran have to do with "using the AUR", which many Arch users don't do (binary repos are nice), and which you've arbitrarily redefined as "upload to the AUR" -- a definite subset of "using the AUR" which even fewer people do?

Why would someone with 1400 posts on these boards and who has been here for 11 years, be immune to having some head-scratching issue that confuses them? The initial thread posting is entirely reasonable IMO.

You do have a point about the commands to test it being mentioned and easily used to test the hypothesis "I think it's because I removed the user part". But I really don't believe there is any rule that long-time users are required to no longer have the perspective of an inexperienced user who needs help in logically thinking through the problem.

If you just despise the inexperienced, you can curse them out or accuse them of intentionally malicious "trolling" or whatever judgmentalism you'd like to engage in, without taking into account how long one has been here. Idiots and fools who don't deserve your magnificent help, presumably don't deserve your magnificent help even on their first day here.

(Please do not accuse people of trolling unless you're a whole lot more sure than you have any right to be, here.)

eschwartz · 2021-04-23 01:11:08

Lockheed wrote:

I think it's because I removed the user part. Here's the whole one:

ssh-rsa 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 juha@panzor

I'd like to reiterate what I said before:

eschwartz wrote:

The whitespace-separated word at the end is a comment, and does not matter.

Your analysis is wrong. Also, the posted output is still, according to ssh-keygen -l, "not a public key file".

Also:

eschwartz wrote:

The AUR validates the pubkey as invalid (strict mode) base64.

The reason I said this is because I was actually looking at the source code for the AUR as I said it, and tested it with your key, and that is the error it gave.

If you'd like further proof that it is the base64 string here which is a problem and NOT the comment...

The AUR will, upon successfully accepting a key, delete the user part (i.e. "the comment") before storing the rest, and returning to the AUR profile page will show only "ssh-rsa <base64-string>", no juha@panzor left.

All in all, I don't know why your ssh key is completely broken, but the quickest fix is to generate a new one.

Or you could investigate shell history etc. to try to figure out what happened to the current one.

You could also try using

ssh-keygen -y -f ~/.ssh/aur

and compare the output to ~/.ssh/aur.pub -- if the -y option successfully recreates the public key from scratch, then the ~/.ssh/aur file is a valid private key -- and the differences between the old public key file and the one you've just printed with -y, might indicate how it got corrupted.

a821 · 2021-04-23 09:19:47

You could also generate a Ed25519 key. They are shorter and less likely to get mangled by C&P.

ssh-keygen -f ~/.ssh/aur -t ed25519

Lockheed · 2021-04-23 10:42:26

My apologies, I was tired last night and did not mention that I did in fact tested this key with
what eschwart mentioned earlier in this thread:

ssh-keygen -lf  ~/.ssh/aur.pub
3072 SHA256:ASCgC7q/6zGOQ4toOFcdF/BECmME1CZ9bI26beFvvwo juha@panzor (RSA)

which I assume is a positive verification?

With regards to the suggestion to compare the key outputs, I see no differences:

cat ~/.ssh/aur.pub 
ssh-rsa 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 juha@panzor

~> ssh-keygen -y -f ~/.ssh/aur

ssh-rsa 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 juha@panzor

@a821, I tried your suggestion (which indeed simplifies the key a lot), resulting with

ssh-ed25519 AAAAC3NzaC1lZDI1NTE5AAAAIJI4BqK/tnKCi77u+v8y2Feu4k5ueieMLBCP/RtWdQob juha@panzor

but the result is the same

The PGP key fingerprint is invalid.

schard · 2021-04-23 10:51:57

Lockheed wrote:

My apologies, I was tired last night and did not mention that I did in fact tested this key with
what eschwart mentioned earlier in this thread:
ssh-keygen -lf  ~/.ssh/aur.pub
3072 SHA256:ASCgC7q/6zGOQ4toOFcdF/BECmME1CZ9bI26beFvvwo juha@panzor (RSA)
which I assume is a positive verification?

Indeed it is.

Lockheed wrote:

@a821, I tried your suggestion (which indeed simplifies the key a lot), resulting with
ssh-ed25519 AAAAC3NzaC1lZDI1NTE5AAAAIJI4BqK/tnKCi77u+v8y2Feu4k5ueieMLBCP/RtWdQob juha@panzor
but the result is the same
The PGP key fingerprint is invalid.

Are you trying to paste the SSH key into the PGP key field? Then you're in the wrong place in the AUR web UI.
The field for the SSH keys is below the two password fields.

Last edited by schard (2021-04-23 10:52:48)

Lockheed · 2021-04-23 10:55:06

This is the only field for keys I can see:

https://i.imgur.com/eObvlQF.png

Mod Edit - Replaced oversized image with link.
CoC - Pasting pictures and code

Last edited by Slithery (2021-04-23 11:41:55)

schard · 2021-04-23 10:57:34

Check the field "PGP-Key-Fingerprint" (or alike, I have my interface in German).
Most likely the web application is complaining about an invalid value there.

Lockheed · 2021-04-23 11:05:04

It contains my forum/AUR nickname. What is supposed to be in there?

schard · 2021-04-23 11:07:27

Well, since the label says "PGP-Key-Fingerprint" and not "AUR nickname", probably not the latter, but the former.
If you don't use PGP, just leave the field empty.

Lockheed · 2021-04-23 11:13:54

Bloody hell. Now I understand.
LastPass browser plugin kept putting my nickname in there after several seconds of getting into the profile edit, which made me think it was always there.
I removed it and it solved the problem.

Thank you and everyone else for the their time and suggestions!

Last edited by Lockheed (2021-04-23 11:14:24)

eschwartz · 2021-04-23 22:18:59

Lockheed wrote:

My apologies, I was tired last night and did not mention that I did in fact tested this key with
what eschwart mentioned earlier in this thread:

ssh-keygen -lf  ~/.ssh/aur.pub
3072 SHA256:ASCgC7q/6zGOQ4toOFcdF/BECmME1CZ9bI26beFvvwo juha@panzor (RSA)

which I assume is a positive verification?

With regards to the suggestion to compare the key outputs, I see no differences:

cat ~/.ssh/aur.pub 
ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAADAQABAAABgQC17ByDbFOgk8J+h00l1U+cJzGYJBdY+coGjqfGU9D6b4B8Zm9X/7ZEfSd5DhS/ZmecuKd6tCmKtVKnxyDx0F54a6eVX4N/bCAX4gxEkZLGzPdLSjEMx0l/oEYq5zu0kmEJpk1Kn3fwXN2x4VUe45o+n368+R9W2MbuJDh70/tKXp9T4B40C5L6XBsD3Uwu5ThE7xB78lbvATnWtmuGLtCSzb3qiuSEg9H3kf98i4sKYjFILCVsX5C0ShqT+GxYuotUhgxj4OJQtlfuDPF5ZKYWuX//N+tBtVWg8J2CtvTe0NuSDo+pD3Tn09aMLaJPlzq47n6z52TOwxHd8JqgS281YaCr9to2jTXoQNwm+1jwJ7MB/0PbExQXAGcYSNflaodXB2uW2Dcjj8e7/CQATQJmUn6sWHfgfpe2t7xTkInqMmBe4ygBF1nlmnbjRvFWA7U5YmwFJUhCFTJXDKjjpOLH+h72q5Id5qwQIRPTxyXp1BfXJ5pJX8A9W1l3lOFyjP8= juha@panzor

~> ssh-keygen -y -f ~/.ssh/aur

ssh-rsa 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 juha@panzor

Diff of the first one you posted in post #12, and the one you just posted right here:

-ssh-rsa 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 juha@panzor
+ssh-rsa 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 juha@panzor

Notice the "/" all got removed the first time you posted (but apparently were still in the file!)

Arch Linux

#1 2021-04-22 19:21:08

[solved] Cannot save AUR profile - The PGP key fingerprint is invalid

#2 2021-04-22 20:08:15

Re: [solved] Cannot save AUR profile - The PGP key fingerprint is invalid

#3 2021-04-22 20:33:07

Re: [solved] Cannot save AUR profile - The PGP key fingerprint is invalid

#4 2021-04-22 20:33:08

Re: [solved] Cannot save AUR profile - The PGP key fingerprint is invalid

#5 2021-04-22 20:39:56

Re: [solved] Cannot save AUR profile - The PGP key fingerprint is invalid

#6 2021-04-22 20:57:11

Re: [solved] Cannot save AUR profile - The PGP key fingerprint is invalid

#7 2021-04-22 21:00:10

Re: [solved] Cannot save AUR profile - The PGP key fingerprint is invalid

#8 2021-04-22 21:06:35

Re: [solved] Cannot save AUR profile - The PGP key fingerprint is invalid

#9 2021-04-22 21:08:34

Re: [solved] Cannot save AUR profile - The PGP key fingerprint is invalid

#10 2021-04-22 21:39:13

Re: [solved] Cannot save AUR profile - The PGP key fingerprint is invalid

#11 2021-04-22 21:42:44

Re: [solved] Cannot save AUR profile - The PGP key fingerprint is invalid

#12 2021-04-22 21:47:59

Re: [solved] Cannot save AUR profile - The PGP key fingerprint is invalid

#13 2021-04-22 23:15:13

Re: [solved] Cannot save AUR profile - The PGP key fingerprint is invalid

#14 2021-04-23 00:55:41

Re: [solved] Cannot save AUR profile - The PGP key fingerprint is invalid

#15 2021-04-23 01:11:08

Re: [solved] Cannot save AUR profile - The PGP key fingerprint is invalid

#16 2021-04-23 09:19:47

Re: [solved] Cannot save AUR profile - The PGP key fingerprint is invalid

#17 2021-04-23 10:42:26

Re: [solved] Cannot save AUR profile - The PGP key fingerprint is invalid

#18 2021-04-23 10:51:57

Re: [solved] Cannot save AUR profile - The PGP key fingerprint is invalid

#19 2021-04-23 10:55:06

Re: [solved] Cannot save AUR profile - The PGP key fingerprint is invalid

#20 2021-04-23 10:57:34

Re: [solved] Cannot save AUR profile - The PGP key fingerprint is invalid

#21 2021-04-23 11:05:04

Re: [solved] Cannot save AUR profile - The PGP key fingerprint is invalid

#22 2021-04-23 11:07:27

Re: [solved] Cannot save AUR profile - The PGP key fingerprint is invalid

#23 2021-04-23 11:13:54

Re: [solved] Cannot save AUR profile - The PGP key fingerprint is invalid

#24 2021-04-23 22:18:59

Re: [solved] Cannot save AUR profile - The PGP key fingerprint is invalid

Board footer