beryl vs gconf

zeus · 2006-12-03 18:16:40

trying to build from /unstable/

checking for GCONF... configure: error: Package requirements ("gconf-2.0") were not met:

No package 'gconf-2.0' found

Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a non-standard prefix.

Alternatively, you may set the environment variables GCONF_CFLAGS
and GCONF_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
See the pkg-config man page for more details.

But beryl should not depend on gconf, wtf?

brain0 · 2006-12-04 01:27:13

I forgot to add makedepends=('gconf'), sorry. Beryl guys are making libberylsettings modular, so they can provide optional gconf support (they need it because they want Ubuntu integration so baldy). The ini-file based configuration is still supported and gconf backend isn't working yet. Still, there is no configure option to prevent it from being built, I guess you could patch the autotools files to do that.

Romashka · 2006-12-04 16:25:53

That's bad. I was thinking about using Beryl+Emerald with Xfce today, but I don't want gconf.

stonecrest · 2006-12-04 19:27:23

Romashka wrote:

That's bad. I was thinking about using Beryl+Emerald with Xfce today, but I don't want gconf.

As brain0 said, it's a makedepend and gconf support is optional. So you can do exactly what you want.

Romashka · 2006-12-04 19:59:26

stonecrest wrote:

As brain0 said, it's a makedepend and gconf support is optional. So you can do exactly what you want.

Ah, my bad. I didn't read carefully. :oops:

Arch Linux

#1 2006-12-03 18:16:40

beryl vs gconf

#2 2006-12-04 01:27:13

Re: beryl vs gconf

#3 2006-12-04 16:25:53

Re: beryl vs gconf

#4 2006-12-04 19:27:23

Re: beryl vs gconf

#5 2006-12-04 19:59:26

Re: beryl vs gconf

Board footer