You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I am in the process of converting my home desktop system from EXT4+LVM to btrfs and still trying to wrap my head around btrfs.
Under EXT4, I had my big media files (digital picture collection, etc) in a separate filesystem mounted as /mnt/data. I bind mounted the appropriate /home directories to /mnt/data. So /home/user/pictures bind mounts to /mnt/data/pictures, and so on.
In my dim understanding of btrfs, it seems like a subvolume is a "fancy" sub-directory, and mounting a subvolume is kind of like a more sophisticated bind mount. With this in mind, maybe it would be a good idea to organize /mnt/data so that each media directory is a subvolume, and mount the subvolumes to /home, instead of doing bind mounts.
Would there be any point to this, or am I over thinking things?
Offline
Well, if you mount a subvolume, you only see it once, while with a bind mount, you have the same mount twice. Just in case, that is important for some reason. If not, the way I understand your post, there is nothing wrong with your approach. For this case it would be sufficient to convert /mnt/data to btrfs.
Offline
Pages: 1