You are not logged in.
arch
6.13.8-arch1-1
llama.cpp
version: 4954 (3cd3a395)
built with cc (GCC) 14.2.1 20250207 for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
I have a dual setup with a 5090 and a 4090 and if I use the `nvidia 570.133.07-2` package the 5090 does not show up.
So I'm using the `nvidia-open` package but, interestingly enough, the 4090 outperforms the 5090 when it comes to LLM inference, with llama.cpp.
Is there something I might be missing?
Offline
Is there something I might be missing?
That linux drivers need a long time to get optimized for specific GPUs. Your lucky it even works (surprisingly the open source solution). Generally don't buy GPUs for the first few months after release if you want to daily drive it
Time (and other peoples effort) will fix it.
(In case you want to get involved, have a look at https://github.com/NVIDIA/open-gpu-kernel-modules)
Last edited by jl2 (2025-03-25 19:27:27)
Why I run Arch? To "BTW I run Arch" the guy one grade younger.
And to let my siblings and cousins laugh at Arsch Linux...
Offline
Thanks
Offline
Your lucky it even works (surprisingly the open source solution). Generally don't buy GPUs for the first few months after release if you want to daily drive it
Why is that surprising? Blackwell and newer will only be supported by the open source solution.
Edit:
Another issue might be llama.cpp not having added support for the SM100 architecture.
Last edited by loqs (2025-03-25 21:59:19)
Offline
Why is that surprising? Blackwell and newer will only be supported by the open source solution.
That doesn't change that nvidia has a bad reputation on their open source linux drivers.
Perhaps I should have refraised that to I wouldn't buy GPUs for the first couple of months for stability reasons.
Have you seen any 9070 issues yet?
Why I run Arch? To "BTW I run Arch" the guy one grade younger.
And to let my siblings and cousins laugh at Arsch Linux...
Offline
That doesn't change that nvidia has a bad reputation on their open source linux drivers.
No they don't. You do realize we're not talking about nouveau, right?
Online
jl2 wrote:That doesn't change that nvidia has a bad reputation on their open source linux drivers.
No they don't. You do realize we're not talking about nouveau, right?
Oh. right. whatever. Just me grrr-ing around about wrong stuff.
Why I run Arch? To "BTW I run Arch" the guy one grade younger.
And to let my siblings and cousins laugh at Arsch Linux...
Offline
Blackwell and newer will only be supported by the open source solution.
I couldn't find any sources for this. Is this legit? Can you point me to official sources?
Offline
loqs wrote:Blackwell and newer will only be supported by the open source solution.
I couldn't find any sources for this. Is this legit? Can you point me to official sources?
https://us.download.nvidia.com/XFree86/ … _open.html
https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/nvidi … l-modules/
Last edited by Scimmia (2025-03-26 11:13:28)
Online
Have you seen any 9070 issues yet?
Offline
Blackwell and newer will only be supported by the open source solution.
They are listed as supported by the proprietary driver under the Linux x64 (AMD64/EM64T) Display Driver 570.133.07 | Linux 64-bit
GeForce RTX 50 Series (Notebooks)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop GPU, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop GPU, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop GPUGeForce RTX 50 Series
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
Offline
loqs wrote:Blackwell and newer will only be supported by the open source solution.
They are listed as supported by the proprietary driver under the Linux x64 (AMD64/EM64T) Display Driver 570.133.07 | Linux 64-bit
That tarball contains both the open and closed sources. Please read the kernel open section of the README for that driver that Scimmia already linked to in post #6.
Offline