You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Hi,
I'm a wanna-be ArchLinux user. (I currently use gentoo)
But before switching over, I'd like to try Arch on a livecd, make sure of hardware compabilities etc.
I tried Archie, and the experience was disasterous... my boot wouldn't even go past the "Loading Udev events" stage.
I have a relatively common hardware platform.... Intel Centrino 1,73GHz CPU, Intel 915 MotherBoard, Intel 915GM integrated graphics card, IPW2200 Wireless etc. (it's a Sony vaio FJ1s (FJ170) laptop).
The most recent post on Archie's forums dates back to Nov 2006.
So, I thought I'd try my luck over here.
anyone care to give me some advice?
Thanks,
Shane
Offline
Perhaps you could try MeoW.
Anyway, if your hardware works under Gentoo, there's no reason it wouldn't work under Arch. Kernel is the key, not userpace.
Offline
Perhaps you could try MeoW.
Thanks. I'm downloading it right now
Anyway, if your hardware works under Gentoo, there's no reason it wouldn't work under Arch. Kernel is the key, not userpace.
I'm sure it'll work, but the question is at what cost?
I'd prefer to see 80% of things working, with an "out of box" installation.....
Offline
larch, and z4ziggy has just picked up Archie again... release might be sometime.
Offline
Meow is not ready yet. The live cd that is currently available for download is based on Slackware.
Offline
yeah, I noticed that... I guess I thought about Arch a bit too early...
I'm gonna wait for a while.
Offline
I can only second the opinion that your hardware will work flawlessly. There are a bunch of people having tested the same config and it worked, if I ain't blind at all.
celestary
Intel Core2Duo E6300 @ 1.86 GHz
kernel26
KDEmod current repository
Offline
If you have free HD space, you could install Arch on a seperate partition to try it out. That way, you'll still have your gentoo installation if you decide that Arch is not for you.
Offline
If you have free HD space, you could install Arch on a seperate partition to try it out. That way, you'll still have your gentoo installation if you decide that Arch is not for you.
yeah, I guess this might be the best option.
I would definitely want to migrate to Arch... but the main question for me is "when?"
I can only second the opinion that your hardware will work flawlessly. There are a bunch of people having tested the same config and it worked, if I ain't blind at all.
flawlessly? (nice joke)
I think you're under-estimating the task significantly..... I switched 6 different pre-compiled kernels under SuSE 10.1 just to get my sound (ALSA) working properly.
I would call it "flawless" when I get the suspend to RAM, hibernate to disk, cpu freq governers, built-in webcam, special function keys etc all working under Arch, and yet end up with a consistent and overall efficient system.
Offline
Or perhaps you're underestimating Arch ;-)
Offline
I think that Arch is able to get the best out of your system if you put some effort in the detailled configuration...
It's all a matter of time.
celestary
Intel Core2Duo E6300 @ 1.86 GHz
kernel26
KDEmod current repository
Offline
punter, i have the same hardware via toshiba and mine works fine...
Last edited by heathen (2007-03-08 23:06:38)
insanity happens...
Offline
I have a Larch Live DVD on dual-layer media which has 7.6GB of data...boots into arch at ~800MB and runs copy-to-ram and has unionfs to permit install of any pacman program r/w on an overlay.
Look into Larch for its latest 3.2 version. Works great and can be booted from flsh and save session on reboot! A great set of scripts!!!!
It does have a CD capability at 700MB max but all features are provided.
Prediction...This year will be a very odd year!
Hard work does not kill people but why risk it: Charlie Mccarthy
A man is not complete until he is married..then..he is finished.
When ALL is lost, what can be found? Even bytes get lonely for a little bit! X-ray confirms Iam spineless!
Offline
Pages: 1