You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Last edited by stjepan (2022-09-20 21:54:28)
Offline
Nice find, stjepan. I might give 8.42 another whirl now that I've got a possible solution to the corruption and a possible solution to amdcccle going silly.
Offline
Wow, nice fine stjepan. I'll try this one out. Thanks!
Offline
==> Starting build()...
PKGBUILD: line 21: patch: command not found
==> ERROR: Build Failed. Aborting...
This is what i'm getting when running makepkg, any ideas?
Offline
pacman -S patch
-edit-
Actually, if you want to build packages, you should ensure you have all of base-devel: pacman -S base-devel
Last edited by Cerebral (2007-11-07 02:02:38)
Offline
pacman -S patch
-edit-
Actually, if you want to build packages, you should ensure you have all of base-devel: pacman -S base-devel
Thanks, base-devel was incomplete here.
Disappointed coz your new 8.42.3 (or lower) amdcccle doesn't work??
1. Get libx11 PKGBUILD from ABS
2. Remove xcb dependency if there's one
3. Change --with-xcb to --without-xcb (if --without-xcb is already there, just go to the next step)
4. Makepkg
5. Copy pkg/usr/lib/libX11.so.6.2.0 to ~
6. Run amdcccle: LD_PRELOAD=~/libX11.so.6.2.0 amdcccle
7. Say hello to your new hot amdcccle control panel! ;-)
Hot Indeed!
Working like a charm, thanks.
Offline
Worked for me too. Thank you!
Offline
[root@keflap ~]# LD_PRELOAD=~/libX11.so.6.2.0 amdcccle
Session management error: Authentication Rejected, reason : None of the authentication protocols specified are supported and host-based authentication failed
This is what i get when i try to start it up after folllowing the steps above. Nothing happens and the cpu usage goes up to 100%. I'm using XFCE, anyone has any idea about what's going on? I don't i am afraid and not being able to use the control panel really sucks!
EDIT : Nevermind guys i tried the command again and the second time around a neat control center popped up and made me a happy fella.
Last edited by kefir (2007-11-09 02:27:24)
| ruskprick @ irc | simple is smart |
Offline
cant we get this "patched" lib in official repos?
Or are there downsides to this?
Offline
To the best of my knowledge, libxcb support was just recently built into libx11. There is some purpose to it being there - I think it might be needed for compiz or something of that sort. I'll verify.
Offline
Pages: 1