You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
As I remember ArchLinux goal was to make one iso for one kernel.
So what happened?
There is no new iso announced for quite long time.
I know there is no big need for new iso's but if ArchLinux wants to be popular it has to hit news sometimes?
Offline
Arch doesn't want to be popular. It wants to be high-quality.
From the looks of the dev mailing list, they're working on some major refinements to the initscripts before releasing a new iso. I expect it'll be out by the end of March.
Dusty
Offline
I know there is no big need for new iso's but if ArchLinux wants to be popular it has to hit news sometimes?
Maybe, surely there are better ways to hit the news than with new iso announcements though. Let the likes of ubuntu compete on iso releases. Let arch compete on it's merits.
Offline
"major refinements to the initscripts" <- nice ![]()
Offline
the new iso image will come out soon
Offline
well...there you have it then.
/path/to/Truth
Offline
the new iso image will come out soon
that seeming a real official like statement with a very concrete timeframe i just went ahead and did and ftp-install. Unlike other people stated I did not encouter any trouble whatsoever, I just hope that doing an ftp -install does not cause any fragmentation on my fileystemen, i.e. I have no clue where it puts and deletes the downloaded stuff from before install, i can imagine that this is less of a problem from the .iso.
stefan
"root# su - bofh"
OS: F10_x64, Arch, Centos5.3, RHEL4.7, RHEL5.3
Desktop Hardware: Dell Precision M65 laptop, core2duo, 2gb, 80gb 7200rpm
Registered linux user #459910 since 1998
Offline
Arch doesn't want to be popular. It wants to be high-quality.
Amen! ![]()
Have you Syued today?
Free music for free people! | Earthlings
"Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away." -- A. de Saint-Exupery
Offline
Hmm yes, some people seem to be focussed on distribution popularity these days (damn that distrowatch page ranking!), while overlooking the real battle: Open Source vs. Proprietary
flack 2.0.6: menu-driven BASH script to easily tag FLAC files (AUR)
knock-once 1.2: BASH script to easily create/send one-time sequences for knockd (forum/AUR)
Offline
This thread is the saving grace of Archlinux. ![]()
Offline
i was always wondering why distrowatch doesnt ever list forthcoming Archlinux releases. i guess the reason is that almost every time the release schedule means nothing, just like the Archlinux releases.
Though someone might claim that this time there is a reason to release even an rc ftp iso since ftp installations have been broken for months, since the pacman 3.1 release iirc
There shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs or vi -- mg (1)
[You learn that sarcasm does not often work well in international forums. That is why we avoid it. -- ewaller (arch linux forum moderator)
Offline
Pages: 1