You are not logged in.

#1 2008-05-13 12:29:10

monotiz
Member
Registered: 2007-10-20
Posts: 140

suggestions for SATA, PATA, SCSI module...

Hi,
this is my lspci

[tiziano@arch32 ~]$ lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 915GM/PM/GMS/910GML Express Processor to DRAM Controller (rev 03)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 915GM/PM Express PCI Express Root Port (rev 03)
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) High Definition Audio Controller (rev 03)
00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) USB UHCI #1 (rev 03)
00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) USB UHCI #2 (rev 03)
00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) USB UHCI #3 (rev 03)
00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) USB UHCI #4 (rev 03)
00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller (rev 03)
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 Mobile PCI Bridge (rev d3)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801FBM (ICH6M) LPC Interface Bridge (rev 03)
00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) IDE Controller (rev 03)
00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801FBM (ICH6M) SATA Controller (rev 03)
00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) SMBus Controller (rev 03)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV43 [GeForce Go 6200/6400] (rev a1)
06:05.0 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI7420 CardBus Controller
06:05.2 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments PCI7x20 1394a-2000 OHCI Two-Port PHY/Link-Layer Controller
06:05.3 Mass storage controller: Texas Instruments PCI7420/7620 Combo CardBus, 1394a-2000 OHCI and SD/MS-Pro Controller
06:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82562ET/EZ/GT/GZ - PRO/100 VE (LOM) Ethernet Controller Mobile (rev 03)
06:0b.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 2200BG Network Connection (rev 05)

Can I remove the PATA modules for recompile kernel?
How do with the SCSI?

Thanks.

Last edited by monotiz (2008-05-13 16:10:50)

Offline

#2 2008-05-13 17:42:25

kishd
Member
Registered: 2006-06-14
Posts: 401

Re: suggestions for SATA, PATA, SCSI module...

May I ask why you would want to remove the modules from the kernel?


---for there is nothing either good or bad, but only thinking makes it so....
Hamlet, W Shakespeare

Offline

#3 2008-05-13 19:24:57

monotiz
Member
Registered: 2007-10-20
Posts: 140

Re: suggestions for SATA, PATA, SCSI module...

kishd wrote:

May I ask why you would want to remove the modules from the kernel?

I would like optimize kernel...

Offline

#4 2008-05-14 04:07:36

kishd
Member
Registered: 2006-06-14
Posts: 401

Re: suggestions for SATA, PATA, SCSI module...

When the kernel is installed by pacman mkinitcpio is used to load the modules needed for booting the kernel.
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Mkinitcpio. You could modify /etc/mkinitcpio.conf removing pata scsi etc to see which modules you actually need for booting. You could also use the kernel parameter disablemodules=module1,module2.....etc. to test which modules you do not need to boot/run your system before rebuilding the kernel without those modules.

Last edited by kishd (2008-05-14 04:08:25)


---for there is nothing either good or bad, but only thinking makes it so....
Hamlet, W Shakespeare

Offline

#5 2008-05-14 06:55:52

monotiz
Member
Registered: 2007-10-20
Posts: 140

Re: suggestions for SATA, PATA, SCSI module...

kishd wrote:

When the kernel is installed by pacman mkinitcpio is used to load the modules needed for booting the kernel.
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Mkinitcpio. You could modify /etc/mkinitcpio.conf removing pata scsi etc to see which modules you actually need for booting. You could also use the kernel parameter disablemodules=module1,module2.....etc. to test which modules you do not need to boot/run your system before rebuilding the kernel without those modules.

Thanks. big_smile

Offline

#6 2008-05-14 13:19:01

schivmeister
Developer/TU
From: Singapore
Registered: 2007-05-17
Posts: 971
Website

Re: suggestions for SATA, PATA, SCSI module...

ata_piix libata sd_mod


I need real, proper pen and paper for this.

Offline

#7 2008-06-03 03:17:11

vsk
Member
Registered: 2008-05-27
Posts: 70

Re: suggestions for SATA, PATA, SCSI module...

From what I understand, isn't sata a more robust data transfer method than pata? Why are both needed?

Offline

#8 2008-06-03 05:31:25

.:B:.
Forum Fellow
Registered: 2006-11-26
Posts: 5,819
Website

Re: suggestions for SATA, PATA, SCSI module...

monotiz wrote:
kishd wrote:

May I ask why you would want to remove the modules from the kernel?

I would like optimize kernel...

How about checking for the modules you are actually using? That should be where you start:

lsmod

Make sure you put those in, then add what you need/want.


Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy

Offline

#9 2008-06-03 10:10:08

schivmeister
Developer/TU
From: Singapore
Registered: 2007-05-17
Posts: 971
Website

Re: suggestions for SATA, PATA, SCSI module...

vsk wrote:

From what I understand, isn't sata a more robust data transfer method than pata? Why are both needed?

If you're refering to my post:

ata_piix is hybrid, supports both pata and sata a la "IDE mode", and is dependent on libata. You'd also want ahci.


I need real, proper pen and paper for this.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB