You are not logged in.
No logs?
Maybe both additions and deletions should be voted like digg. They stay in a queue until they get N votes. 24 TUs. 7150 packages in unsupported. TU moderation is not going to happen.
Last edited by SpookyET (2008-06-02 03:44:43)
Offline
I want my *-ubuntu packages back ![]()
Offline
That would be extremely awesome. I would do it except I have no idea how to and I'm insanely busy with exams at the moment :-P However I think someone tried to do it before and they couldn't because of the existing *-ubuntu packages on the server. This may require the intervention of a higher power.
Offline
Offline
Upload the ones you can then add the ones that fail to http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8672
Offline
Upload the ones you can then add the ones that fail to http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8672
done. 2 packages added to bugtracker
Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Blog
Offline
Allan wrote:Upload the ones you can then add the ones that fail to http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8672
done. 2 packages added to bugtracker
Thanks
Those 4 are all of the ones I've got installed. I don't know if there are any more which I don't use though.
Offline
There is still no libxft-ubuntu or fontconfig-ubuntu. I know I'm impatient but I just wanted to remind whoever needs to do something about it. ![]()
Offline
i'm waiting devs to fix the problem. I can't upload them. i sent mail and they told me to be patience but i don't know how long
Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Blog
Offline
Ok thanks. Just as long as you haven't forgotten about them
I really need to learn how to use the AUR...maybe after my exams I'll adopt some packages ![]()
Offline
Sorry to bump again but this problem still exists and the current versions are out-of-date and impossible to update.
Offline
Offline
*jumps up and down with joy* ![]()
Offline
Thanks
Shame the freetype2 patch isn't up-to-date
Pacman is not happy as the latest version of libxfont apparently depends on freetype2>=2.3.7. My system seems fine though except for a bit of font weirdness in firefox (which I probably caused).
Offline
@rocktorrentz just updated. grabe it ![]()
i used debian patch + enable-subpixel-rendering.patch from ubuntu.
Last edited by wonder (2008-07-10 15:35:08)
Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Blog
Offline
You wonder! (See what I did there :-p)
Offline
Since you have to be a member, and logged into aur, to adopt a package, isn't there a way for the server to record the owner of the package when it's adopted/deleted? It seems like it wouldn't be that difficult to identify the user/culprit who is abusing aur. If so, they could banned from logging into aur, or from the arch community altogether. Maybe I'm being naive? It's a real shame that someone would do this! *sigh*
It makes you wonder how long it would be before someone strategically starts adding bad info to the wiki that may not be that easy to catch, or deleting very useful info, as it's very accessable to members for editing.
Last edited by Leigh (2008-07-11 03:32:08)
-- archlinux 是一个极好的 linux。
Offline