You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Didn't know VirtualBox is great. For many years I used Win4Lin until there was no support for kernel-2.6.12=>. Had to go back for dual booting, running native Windows. VirtualBox solve it.
If anyone is interested, read in Wiki:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VirtualBox
Offline
Umm... well... VirtualBox is hardly something new as it's been around for a few years now. By now it's more or less as famous as vmware in linux circles at least. I think that it is far better than Win4Lin ever really was so I think you'll appreciate the switch.
In my opinion VirtualBox is absolutely perfect for most virtualization purposes in a desktop environment and definitely a really good open-source alternative to vmware.
I haven't lost my mind; I have a tape back-up somewhere.
Twitter
Offline
Umm... well... VirtualBox is hardly something new as it's been around for a few years now. By now it's more or less as famous as vmware in linux circles at least. I think that it is far better than Win4Lin ever really was so I think you'll appreciate the switch.
In my opinion VirtualBox is absolutely perfect for most virtualization purposes in a desktop environment and definitely a really good open-source alternative to vmware.
Exacly. VMWare is still a bit more powerful, but VirutalBox is sweet. Sweet enough that Sun wanted to buy it ![]()
The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck, is the day they make a vacuum cleaner.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But if they tell you that I've lost my mind, maybe it's not gone just a little hard to find...
Offline
In my opinion VirtualBox is absolutely perfect for most virtualization purposes in a desktop environment and definitely a really good open-source alternative to vmware.
I'm starting to agree. After several years of patching VMware so that I could use the latest Linux kernels*, I finally gave in and tried VirtualBox just a month or so ago. So far, I haven't found anything that I need that VirtualBox doesn't offer. Occasionally I find that the USB stuff doesn't work quite as slickly as VMware's, but otherwise I've been perfectly happy. On my system, VBox even seems to be a little more responsive than VMware.
*In their defense, VMware never claimed to support those latest Linux kernels -- in fact, never claimed to support any Linux distro that I chose to use -- so I suppose I can't protest too much. Still, the relative ease with which I could get VBox to install on a brand new kernel made me a believer.
Last edited by dhave (2008-08-22 22:04:54)
Offline
Pages: 1