You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Hi guys.
Recently had a lot of problems with wireless (07:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g (rev 01)) on my laptop after upgrading the kernel and the ndiswrapper driver (to 2.6.26-ARCH and 1.53) . The only thing that I could do is to downgrade the kernel (with all the dependencies). In some ubuntu forum I read that it's better not to upgrade the kernel if everything is working.
What everuone thinks about this?
P.S. Also there is a newbie question. Should I post somewhere about this problem?
Offline
Sorry that I can't help you with the kernel issues. I just wanted to say that I keep my kernel updated (desktop) and haven't had any problems so far (except when I first installed Arch and didn't pay attention to the pacman sync warnings). Given I've only been using Arch since the middle of the summer, this may not mean much.
I would expect kernel updates to be generally a good idea though, as they contain bug fixes etc. Maybe a good approach would be to wait a week each time a kernel version is released and to watch the forum and bug tracker for issues. If nothing comes up, give it a try... I'm too impatient for that, but it may work for others.
My Arch Linux Stuff • Forum Etiquette • Community Ethos - Arch is not for everyone
Offline
I would agree that in general, it is not better to update the kernel when everything is working. It becomes an issue after 6 months, or a year, when lots of patches and changes have been checked into the kernel tree. But if the system is working for you and a little kernel update comes out, I would say it is far more likely that you will run into problems rather than discover some change that benefits you greatly.
Offline
If you do decide to not update your kernal, make sure you don't update deivers such as nvidia, catalyst, wireless, etc as they are tied to a specific kernel. Pacman should stop you from doing this though as long as you don't force anything.
Offline
Pages: 1