Firefox 3.0.2 vs Passwords

karoshi · 2008-09-25 15:24:37

Will Arch Linux skip this version and wait for 3.0.3?

brebs · 2008-09-25 16:13:10

The security issues are more important.

wantilles · 2008-09-26 07:05:30

karoshi wrote:

http://support.mozilla.com/nl/kb/Cannot … ng+Firefox
Will Arch Linux skip this version and wait for 3.0.3?

It is irrelevant for the moment anyway, as we have to wait for Mozilla to release xulrunner 1.9.0.2.

foutrelis · 2008-09-26 09:25:38

wantilles wrote:

It is irrelevant for the moment anyway, as we have to wait for Mozilla to release xulrunner 1.9.0.2.

Why? Firefox 3.0.2 compiled fine here with xulrunner 1.9.0.1.

(Excuse my question if it's stupid, I don't know much about Firefox's dependencies and build process)

brebs · 2008-09-26 10:51:12

3.0.3 is out anyway

karoshi · 2008-09-26 13:35:53

brebs wrote:

3.0.3 is out anyway

But that's a beta, let's wait a few days.

Dieter@be · 2008-09-27 09:10:17

karoshi wrote:

brebs wrote:
3.0.3 is out anyway
But that's a beta, let's wait a few days.
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/3. … easenotes/

Looks okay to me. (at least better then 3.0.1)
I see it's not in the repo's... What's the best way to upgrade?

foutrelis · 2008-09-27 10:27:39

Dieter@be wrote:

I see it's not in the repo's... What's the best way to upgrade?

The best way is to wait for the package to be updated by its maintainer, which shouldn't take long.

If you just can't wait, you can go ahead and build the newer version yourself using the ABS.

Dieter@be · 2008-10-05 10:33:44

The package is now available in the official tree.

Arch Linux