You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Has anyone here ever tried compiling a processor-specific build of GCC? If so, does it perform any better and is it worth it?
Offline
Has anyone here ever tried compiling a processor-specific build of GCC? If so, does it perform any better and is it worth it?
Compiling a compiler. Oh yeah baby.
The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck, is the day they make a vacuum cleaner.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But if they tell you that I've lost my mind, maybe it's not gone just a little hard to find...
Offline
Falcata wrote:Has anyone here ever tried compiling a processor-specific build of GCC? If so, does it perform any better and is it worth it?
Compiling a compiler. Oh yeah baby.
Lol, talk about a nerdgasm.
Offline
Did you ever seen the gcc bootstrap? It is pretty interesting, (by memory) it goes like that:
System's gcc compiles gcc.
Compilated gcc compiles gcc.
The second gcc compiles gcc.
If the last two copies are identical all is fine and one is installed.
Offline
Did you ever seen the gcc bootstrap? It is pretty interesting, (by memory) it goes like that:
System's gcc compiles gcc.
Compilated gcc compiles gcc.
The second gcc compiles gcc.
If the last two copies are identical all is fine and one is installed.
Java does stuff like that too. For a while, Iced Tea (OpenJdk) required the "release" version right before it to compile, which in turn required the one right before that, etc.
Offline
Has anyone here ever tried compiling a processor-specific build of GCC? If so, does it perform any better and is it worth it?
Yes, maybe and probably not (or maybe if you are compiling a lot of things...).
Offline
Okay, thanks Allan.
Last edited by Falcata (2008-09-29 03:08:43)
Offline
Pages: 1