You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Is pulseaudio worth using? Am I missing anything by just using alsa? Thanks..
Offline
Pulse audio will give you a lot more control with apps like outputing sound from different apps to different card, volume setting per app (for those without built in volume control), and also its network capable (So you can stream it to another pc).
If it ain't broke, broke it then fix it.
Offline
the only thing i do with audio is listen to music and watch videos. is there any difference in quality with pulse audio?
Offline
the only thing i do with audio is listen to music and watch videos. is there any difference in quality with pulse audio?
No. I use ALSA and I can listen to music, youtube and playing a game at the same time with all the sounds coming out!
Offline
I use pulseaudio, apart from minor glitches it works very well.
However I did not experience a difference in sound quality.
But that's not why I installed it. I love being able to set the volume per application and switch the output on the fly to my usb sound card.
Offline
PulseAudio is more currently more of a hassle than it's worth in my opinion. Unless you have a need for a specific feature of PA then I really wouldn't bother.
As far as quality, PulseAudio uses ALSA in the end to access the soundcard, so the quality should be the same.
Offline
I don't use pulseaudio. Have never missed it. When I was using Fedora it took 5% CPU so I removed it.
Offline
Thanks, my questions have been answered. I always wondered what the big deal was and why alot of distros were starting to use it.
Offline
Pulse audio bugs are one of the main reasons why I switched to Archlinux (from Ubuntu 8.04). I just can't stand sound not working on my laptop. When it's ready (in a year...) and the web's not covered with complaints about its bugs, then I'll reconsider.
Offline
I keep hearing about PulseAudio and being able to set volume per app. I use OSS and ossxmix does this without the need of PulseAudio.
Another win for OSS v ALSA
Offline
afaik oss has it's own problems though? flash problems? java problems? wine problems? x problems? is oss even maintained anymore, didn't the guy go out of business? he opensourced it and lost all his revenue
KISS = "It can scarcely be denied that the supreme goal of all theory is to make the irreducible basic elements as simple and as few as possible without having to surrender the adequate representation of a single datum of experience." - Albert Einstein
Offline
afaik oss has it's own problems though? flash problems? java problems? wine problems? x problems? is oss even maintained anymore, didn't the guy go out of business? he opensourced it and lost all his revenue
Flash problems? Flash works fine.
It is open source, and requires less configuration. That plus Digital Audio out on Intel HDA audio doesn't yet work well with ALSA. I'll stick with OSS thank you and have better hardware support
Offline
afaik oss has it's own problems though? flash problems? java problems? wine problems? x problems? is oss even maintained anymore, didn't the guy go out of business? he opensourced it and lost all his revenue
I have none of the problems you mention and OSS uses less CPU time too
I'll shut up now before I get this thread locked.
Offline
I have a question... does pulseaudio solve the problem with flashplugins laggy sound (if i have firefox opened for too long) The sound lags and i can even hear it after i shut firefox down.
Offline
OSSv4 sounds much better than alsa in my opinion.
Just follow every step in the wiki guide: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/OSS
Offline
I just started using pulseaudio.
Not being able to have sound from youtube and mpd at the same time just drove me crazy and I snapped (I would have to stop mpd, and restart firefox to be able to have sound in youtube). I couldn't take it anymore.
The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck, is the day they make a vacuum cleaner.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But if they tell you that I've lost my mind, maybe it's not gone just a little hard to find...
Offline
I love Pulse, but you need to set it up properly. That's why I came to Arch, so I could control it isntead of relying on packagers.
Sound quality isn't better though.
Allan-Volunteer on the (topic being discussed) mailn lists. You never get the people who matters attention on the forums.
jasonwryan-Installing Arch is a measure of your literacy. Maintaining Arch is a measure of your diligence. Contributing to Arch is a measure of your competence.
Griemak-Bleeding edge, not bleeding flat. Edge denotes falls will occur from time to time. Bring your own parachute.
Offline
i had horrible headaches with PulseAudio... when it worked it was nice... but more often then not it caused glitchy scratchy laggy sound output. Since switching over to OSSV4 I have had zero problems and the sound quality could not be better. Sound from multiple sources just works... every time... and without lag... gotta love kernel space mixing.
OSSv4 sounds much better than alsa in my opinion.
Just follow every step in the wiki guide: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/OSS
agreed!
Last edited by ugkbunb (2009-08-10 15:48:27)
Offline
I only use ALSA and it works great with anything.
Offline
Pages: 1