You are not logged in.

#26 2008-10-08 01:10:38

chilebiker
Member
From: Zurich, Switzerland
Registered: 2006-07-18
Posts: 161

Re: 27 dependencies for vlc?

Same here - when I saw all those dependencies I did a quick pacman -Rs vlc!


Don't panic!

Offline

#27 2008-10-08 07:51:25

wuischke
Member
From: Suisse Romande
Registered: 2007-01-06
Posts: 630

Re: 27 dependencies for vlc?

Just out of curiousity: Is there a difference between a small VLC package with many small dependencies compared to one big VLC package (probably duplicating dependencies) which prompts you to uninstall vlc?

I have done no comparision, but I can't imagine the size to be much different.

Offline

#28 2008-10-18 03:12:45

zenos
Member
Registered: 2008-09-23
Posts: 23

Re: 27 dependencies for vlc?

I uninstalled the new version because I didn't want qt and jack installed on my system along with the 15 other dependencies that came with it.  It's my fault for not paying attention untill after I said yes to the upgrade. Lesson learned.

Offline

#29 2008-10-18 04:01:54

Xyne
Administrator/PM
Registered: 2008-08-03
Posts: 6,963
Website

Re: 27 dependencies for vlc?

wuischke wrote:

Just out of curiousity: Is there a difference between a small VLC package with many small dependencies compared to one big VLC package (probably duplicating dependencies) which prompts you to uninstall vlc?

I have done no comparision, but I can't imagine the size to be much different.

qt's install size, not counting dependencies, is about 65 MB, so there is a difference. That's a bit unpalatable for minimalists. (I'm still using VLC, but I wasn't happy with all the new dependencies either)


My Arch Linux StuffForum EtiquetteCommunity Ethos - Arch is not for everyone

Offline

#30 2008-10-18 09:43:57

moljac024
Member
From: Serbia
Registered: 2008-01-29
Posts: 2,676

Re: 27 dependencies for vlc?

Actually, I just switched to SMPlayer. I was trying to avoid Qt, and that was one advantage VLC had. I won't tolerate it anymore. SMPlayer is way more smooth...


The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck, is the day they make a vacuum cleaner.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But if they tell you that I've lost my mind, maybe it's not gone just a little hard to find...

Offline

#31 2009-05-27 05:30:07

nolochemical
Member
From: St. catharines, Ontario,Canada
Registered: 2009-05-25
Posts: 18
Website

Re: 27 dependencies for vlc?

That sucks.. qt looks great, but way too much bloat. Seems its a shared package though.. skype + vlc are using it so its not the end of the world. They should just try Tkinter or back to gtk+, for the smaller footprint.

Was thinking about smplayer; yet depends on qt4. sad What is eveyone else doing for shoutcast TV support?


We may only attempt to reverse engineer the future.. for now.
walls/screens|.conkyrc

Offline

#32 2009-05-27 05:42:53

DevoidOfWindows
Member
Registered: 2009-05-24
Posts: 133

Re: 27 dependencies for vlc?

zenos wrote:
sash wrote:

Apparently vlc now is pimped out with a qt interface by default:
http://wiki.videolan.org/Interface
Hence the qt deps tongue

Thats cool if you use KDE or don't mind mixing qt and gtk apps. Maybe we'll have a fork? vlc-qt and vlc-gtk? Anyway I'll stick with the old vlc for now. The funny thing is I installed 0.9.3 on my windows box and noticed the shiny new interface but didn't realize it was qt based.

I see nothing wrong here.  [Screenshot:  VLC 0.9.9a-3, GTK]

Last edited by DevoidOfWindows (2009-05-27 05:47:07)

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB