You are not logged in.

#76 2008-11-19 13:46:29

IncredibleLaser
Member
From: Germany, NRW
Registered: 2008-07-16
Posts: 158

Re: 64-bit Flash....Finally

Not really on topic, but I never tried to install flash on 32-bit systems as I think flash has more disadvantages than advantages. For youtube, I use youtube-dl and I barely visit it. Plus you don't get to see many annoying ads. Also, Flash always stressed my cpu, especially when viewing youtube-videos in fullscreen.

Offline

#77 2008-11-19 13:57:56

Vintendo
Member
From: Netherlands
Registered: 2008-04-21
Posts: 375
Website

Re: 64-bit Flash....Finally

For anoying ads there is addblock

Offline

#78 2008-11-19 17:02:47

litemotiv
Forum Fellow
Registered: 2008-08-01
Posts: 5,026

Re: 64-bit Flash....Finally

Xyne wrote:
litemotiv wrote:

Hmm, it seems that with the compiled OSS4 library my pc won't shutdown anymore after playing flash content. It just keeps saying "Shutting down Open Sound System" and nothing is able kill it...

Maybe this solves the problem: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21126

thanks xyne, will give that a try


ᶘ ᵒᴥᵒᶅ

Offline

#79 2008-11-19 17:13:13

el_zoona
Member
From: Argentina
Registered: 2008-02-01
Posts: 58
Website

Re: 64-bit Flash....Finally

Dieter@be wrote:

Hmm that article says that Windows and Macos don't have a 64bit version yet? Linux will be the first? Did I understand that correctly?  All other thoughts aside, that by itself would be pretty sweet.

[Off topic]
Some people is saying that the reason was the active linux developers or testers comunity, that means, Linux user DO report bugs and that makes the life easier for Adobe, so when they launch the plugin for win or mac there will be less erros.

I know, there are some plataform specific bugs, but this is what users are saying.
[/Off Topic]

Anyway, I thinks it is good to be on some big company's agenda. Is it, right? :-P


// Send more Chuck Berry

Offline

#80 2008-11-19 18:53:10

darenw
Member
From: Trego Montana
Registered: 2008-07-04
Posts: 106
Website

Re: 64-bit Flash....Finally

Had trouble getting it to work, getting only the useless white box.  triple checked the .so file, where it was stored, made sure no old flash/gnash installed,  even rebooted.   Turned out to be a permissions problem.  my /usr/lib/mozilla/ didn't have read or execute permission for other than root.  With rx permissions enabled for users, it ran fine. 

Has this problem come up for anyone else?  Why would these permissions have been lacking?  (Should they be lacking for some security reason?)


Artist/Physicist, Herder of Pixels, Photons and Electrons

Offline

#81 2008-11-23 11:19:58

sighter
Member
Registered: 2008-11-23
Posts: 13

Re: 64-bit Flash....Finally

Hello, I have this problem with the permissions to.
Maybe you can help me, how to change the permissions. :-)   Sry for the "Newbie-business"

greetz
Sascha

Offline

#82 2008-11-23 17:17:04

doorknob60
Member
Registered: 2008-09-29
Posts: 403

Re: 64-bit Flash....Finally

sighter: chmod -R 755 /usr/lib/mozilla/ as root or with sudo should do the trick.

For me my Firefox segfaults sometimes when leaving Flash sites and full screen performance is bad (both of these problems occurred to me with Flash 9, and Flash 10 fixed them, now they're back -.-). Oh well it's alpha I can wait. I'm still keeping it though because I don't wanna use nspluginwrapper (even if it was working better).

Last edited by doorknob60 (2008-11-23 17:19:08)

Offline

#83 2008-11-23 18:33:11

buttons
Member
From: NJ, USA
Registered: 2007-08-04
Posts: 620

Re: 64-bit Flash....Finally

Interestingly, full screen performance for me is perfect everywhere but youtube.  When I'm on youtube, moving the mouse causes stuttering.  If I'm still, it's fine.


Cthulhu For President!

Offline

#84 2008-11-23 19:01:11

thomasknowles
Member
From: England
Registered: 2008-11-23
Posts: 38

Re: 64-bit Flash....Finally

I haven't noticed an increase in performance whilst viewing content in full screen mode, particularly whilst viewing videos from [1].

[1] - http://vimeo.com/hd

Offline

#85 2008-11-23 19:17:43

skottish
Forum Fellow
From: Here
Registered: 2006-06-16
Posts: 7,942

Re: 64-bit Flash....Finally

buttons wrote:

Interestingly, full screen performance for me is perfect everywhere but youtube.  When I'm on youtube, moving the mouse causes stuttering.  If I'm still, it's fine.

Confirmed. Even getting a keystroke through, like exit full screen, is difficult.

Offline

#86 2008-11-23 20:57:55

Themaister
Member
From: Trondheim, Norway
Registered: 2008-07-21
Posts: 652
Website

Re: 64-bit Flash....Finally

Army wrote:

I don't use 64bit, but really great news!! Cool thing that they really listen to the people and especially chose Linux to be the first smile Now, what's next? Support BSD!!!!!!!!!!!!

"The 64-bit version of the plugin compiles and runs on FreeBSD 7.0 which I demoed at Flashforward 2008. There are no plans for release yet as it is still rather unstable and will require substantial work to get it ready for public consumption."

Offline

#87 2008-11-23 22:47:41

Zibi1981
Member
From: Poland
Registered: 2008-01-31
Posts: 628

Re: 64-bit Flash....Finally

thomasknowles wrote:

I haven't noticed an increase in performance whilst viewing content in full screen mode, particularly whilst viewing videos from [1].

[1] - http://vimeo.com/hd

I experience pretty bad stuttering while playing HD flash content on this site, regardless if it's in full screen mode or not.


"... being a Linux user is sort of like living in a house inhabited by a large family of carpenters and architects. Every morning when you wake up, the house is a little different. Maybe there is a new turret, or some walls have moved. Or perhaps someone has temporarily removed the floor under your bed."

MSI Raider GE78HX 13VI-032PL

Offline

#88 2008-11-24 00:11:42

iBertus
Member
From: Greenville, NC
Registered: 2004-11-04
Posts: 2,228

Re: 64-bit Flash....Finally

Zibi1981 wrote:
thomasknowles wrote:

I haven't noticed an increase in performance whilst viewing content in full screen mode, particularly whilst viewing videos from [1].

[1] - http://vimeo.com/hd

I experience pretty bad stuttering while playing HD flash content on this site, regardless if it's in full screen mode or not.

Playing video from that site maxes out one of my cores... so that's five times the usage I see with sites like YouTube.

Offline

#89 2008-11-24 01:19:22

thomasknowles
Member
From: England
Registered: 2008-11-23
Posts: 38

Re: 64-bit Flash....Finally

iBertus wrote:
Zibi1981 wrote:
thomasknowles wrote:

I haven't noticed an increase in performance whilst viewing content in full screen mode, particularly whilst viewing videos from [1].

[1] - http://vimeo.com/hd

I experience pretty bad stuttering while playing HD flash content on this site, regardless if it's in full screen mode or not.

Playing video from that site maxes out one of my cores... so that's five times the usage I see with sites like YouTube.

Foolishly I didn't have it on HD, yes the alpha really doesn't like video's of that resolution and/or bitrate. Though native flash is a nice addition and I will be keeping it, I will however, be watching the releases with very keen eyes.

Offline

#90 2008-11-24 01:55:28

Ranguvar
Member
Registered: 2008-08-12
Posts: 2,545

Re: 64-bit Flash....Finally

Flash's H.264 decoding is ridiculously crappy... this is well documented on Doom9. Try playing an H.264 video with Flash, and then again with a "normal" desktop decoder... huge difference. I really hope they work on it a lot. Even their old H.263 decoding sucked, as probably did their VP6. This is one situation I can see Gnash/swfdec really, really being useful. libavcodec would be, naturally, the decoder they would use. While libavcodec is quite a ways behind CoreAVC and especially DivX 7 (Beta)'s decoder, it's still leagues beyond Flash.

Offline

#91 2008-11-24 02:33:05

skottish
Forum Fellow
From: Here
Registered: 2006-06-16
Posts: 7,942

Re: 64-bit Flash....Finally

Ranguvar wrote:

Flash's H.264 decoding is ridiculously crappy... this is well documented on Doom9. Try playing an H.264 video with Flash, and then again with a "normal" desktop decoder... huge difference. I really hope they work on it a lot. Even their old H.263 decoding sucked, as probably did their VP6. This is one situation I can see Gnash/swfdec really, really being useful. libavcodec would be, naturally, the decoder they would use. While libavcodec is quite a ways behind CoreAVC and especially DivX 7 (Beta)'s decoder, it's still leagues beyond Flash.

Unfortunately gnash's rendering engine is crap, and swfdec is a massive resource hog even with using libavcodec, rendering it's H264 decoding poor.

Offline

#92 2008-11-24 04:00:19

Gullible Jones
Member
Registered: 2004-12-29
Posts: 4,863

Re: 64-bit Flash....Finally

Annoyingly, swfdec is not nearly so piggish on FreeBSD; it seems to be a Linux-only bug.

Offline

#93 2008-11-25 15:12:58

mhd
Member
Registered: 2008-02-06
Posts: 21

Re: 64-bit Flash....Finally

For those who've got crashes, check if your installation has the curl package. It's not listed as an requirement (both by Adobe and by the Arch pkg), but seems required. I've found a bug report for Adobe where someone's complaining about a similar situation with an old rpm package, so this might be old news.

Offline

#94 2008-11-26 18:37:07

flamelab
Member
From: Athens, Hellas (Greece)
Registered: 2007-12-26
Posts: 2,160

Re: 64-bit Flash....Finally

Do you think that I should change this in the AUR pkgbuild:

install -m755 to

install -m700

?

Offline

#95 2008-11-26 20:30:43

ssl6
Member
From: Ottawa, ON, CA
Registered: 2007-08-30
Posts: 594

Re: 64-bit Flash....Finally

i tried the 64bit flash package from the repos last night after i readt about it here. and firefox just crashes on my. swfdec doesnt seem to work for me either, at least not for youtube as an example.

i did also check that curl was installed, and it is

i checked the permissions as well, just crashes firefox though, ill wait for the next version, maybe teh 64bit java plugin would be nice too that i just heard about


this is a signature

Offline

#96 2008-11-27 14:49:03

Xyne
Administrator/PM
Registered: 2008-08-03
Posts: 6,963
Website

Re: 64-bit Flash....Finally

Did you uninstall swfdec first? If not, that's probaby why it crashed.


My Arch Linux StuffForum EtiquetteCommunity Ethos - Arch is not for everyone

Offline

#97 2008-11-27 16:21:54

ssl6
Member
From: Ottawa, ON, CA
Registered: 2007-08-30
Posts: 594

Re: 64-bit Flash....Finally

yes i uninstalled it first


this is a signature

Offline

#98 2008-11-28 13:08:58

TripleE
Member
From: Houston, TX
Registered: 2006-10-10
Posts: 64

Re: 64-bit Flash....Finally

Woot! I finally able to switch to 64bit arch.  Flash works great.  Stays in the low 20%.


HP Chromebook 14

Offline

#99 2008-11-30 11:10:02

Elsiko
Member
Registered: 2008-11-30
Posts: 2

Re: 64-bit Flash....Finally

I installed the plugin, but firefox crashed.
I installed curl and now it works fine smile
Thank you

Offline

#100 2008-12-01 00:13:02

ssl6
Member
From: Ottawa, ON, CA
Registered: 2007-08-30
Posts: 594

Re: 64-bit Flash....Finally

wow, i must be the only one left that doesnt have it working, mind you, its not even working on my 32bit system


this is a signature

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB