You are not logged in.
1st off, I am more interested in the how's and why's and understanding of this issue, than in solving it. ![]()
Issue: This error occurs when upgrading flashplugin:
Targets (1): flashplugin-10.0.15.3-1
Total Download Size: 0.00 MB
Total Installed Size: 12.57 MB
Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y
checking package integrity...
(1/1) checking for file conflicts [#####################] 100%
error: could not prepare transaction
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
flashplugin: /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so exists in filesystem
Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
pacman -Qo /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so
error: No package owns /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so
So my questions are:
From the above info, it should be safe to force the upgrade?
Why does the current flashplugin (10.0.12.36-4) not own libflashplayer.so?
Is this a bug that should be reported?
Any and all information is appreciated.
Offline
The error message will appear in a few different contexts. If you ever upgraded that file manually while a package was in place, that would cause the error. Or, if one of the 79 different versions of Flash in AUR didn't install stuff properly, that would do it too. I believe that there are other cases also, but I don't know what they are off the top of my head.
So you know, pacman has quite a bit of information on files in the file system including file size. Take a look at the folders under /var/lib/pacman/local/, in particular the 'desc' files.
Anyway, for this particular file it's fine to force upgrade.
Offline
I had the same issue. My problem I believe was caused by the flashplugin from extra upgrading a previously installed flashplugin from testing. I chose to
pacman -Rsc flashpluginthen
pacman -S flashpluginOffline