You are not logged in.
I want to install flash for watching youtube:(:(
=
yaourt -S flashplugin-alpha-64
Checking Runtime Dependencies...
==> Checking Buildtime Dependencies...
==> Retrieving Sources...
-> Found libflashplayer-10.0.d21.1.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz in build dir
-> Found adobe_eula.txt in build dir
-> Found mms.cfg in build dir
-> Found flashplugin-alpha-64.install in build dir
==> Validating source files with md5sums...
libflashplayer-10.0.d21.1.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz ... Passed
adobe_eula.txt ... Passed
mms.cfg ... Passed
flashplugin-alpha-64.install ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
Error: Makepkg was unable to build flashplugin-alpha-64 package.
=
what's wrong with the md5sum?
Offline
yes. download build from aur, untar it and run makepkg -i or you can install flashplugin from extra. is the same.
pacman -S flashplugin
Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Offline
yes. download build from aur, untar it and run makepkg -i or you can install flashplugin from extra. is the same.
pacman -S flashplugin
Exactly about it being in extra. Good post.
Everyone really should be going to the AUR page before using yaourt. It's a great tool, but knowing what you're downloading is more important than convenience.
Offline
I have been install the flashplugin pakcage, but stilling can't watch youtube.
what is going on?
Offline
any thought here?
Offline
check permission of /usr/lib/mozilla
Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Offline
I just untarred the archive from http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html and did "cp libflashplayer.so /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/".
Is there any reason to go through the seemingly increased hassle of "installing" it?
Offline
Is there any reason to go through the seemingly increased hassle of "installing" it?
Absolutely none. As mentioned above, you can install flashplugin from [extra].
Offline