You are not logged in.

#1 2008-12-29 18:09:48

andre.ramaciotti
Member
From: Brazil
Registered: 2007-04-06
Posts: 649

After updating GHC from testing... [solved]

Do I need to recompile any Haskell related package from AUR (mainly xmonad-darcs and xmonad-contrib-darcs)? If I don't need, should I still recompile?

Last edited by andre.ramaciotti (2008-12-29 22:19:17)


(lambda ())

Offline

#2 2008-12-29 21:44:28

andre.ramaciotti
Member
From: Brazil
Registered: 2007-04-06
Posts: 649

Re: After updating GHC from testing... [solved]

Answering myself: yes, you must. It wouldn't succeed generating the new binary to use a new configuration file if I didn't recompile. Maybe a link to the directory would be enough, but I didn't try it... just thought of it now.


(lambda ())

Offline

#3 2008-12-29 22:04:08

andre.ramaciotti
Member
From: Brazil
Registered: 2007-04-06
Posts: 649

Re: After updating GHC from testing... [solved]

edit: Nevermind, I'll use haskell-x11-darcs from AUR. It compiles fine.

Sorry to bump this, but I'm trying to recompile haskell-x11, from ABS, and I get this message:

==> Making package: haskell-x11 1.4.2-1.2 i686 (Mon Dec 29 19:57:13 BRST 2008)
==> Checking Runtime Dependencies...
==> Checking Buildtime Dependencies...
==> Retrieving Sources...
  -> Found X11-1.4.2.tar.gz in build dir
==> Validating source files with md5sums...
    X11-1.4.2.tar.gz ... Passed
==> Extracting Sources...
  -> bsdtar -x -f X11-1.4.2.tar.gz
==> Removing existing pkg/ directory...
==> Entering fakeroot environment...
==> Starting build()...

Setup.hs:3:0:
    Warning: In the use of `defaultUserHooks'
             (imported from Distribution.Simple):
             Deprecated: "Use simpleUserHooks or autoconfUserHooks, unless you need Cabal-1.2
             compatibility in which case you must stick with defaultUserHooks"
Warning: defaultUserHooks in Setup script is deprecated.
Configuring X11-1.4.2...
checking for gcc... gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of executables... 
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
checking for X... libraries , headers 
checking for gethostbyname... yes
checking for connect... yes
checking for remove... yes
checking for shmat... yes
checking for IceConnectionNumber in -lICE... yes
checking whether to build Xinerama... yes
checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /bin/grep
checking for egrep... /bin/grep -E
checking for ANSI C header files... yes
checking for sys/types.h... yes
checking for sys/stat.h... yes
checking for stdlib.h... yes
checking for string.h... yes
checking for memory.h... yes
checking for strings.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking X11/extensions/Xinerama.h usability... yes
checking X11/extensions/Xinerama.h presence... yes
checking for X11/extensions/Xinerama.h... yes
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating config.mk
config.status: creating X11.buildinfo
config.status: creating include/HsX11Config.h
config.status: include/HsX11Config.h is unchanged
config.status: creating include/X11_extras_config.h
config.status: include/X11_extras_config.h is unchanged

Setup.hs:3:0:
    Warning: In the use of `defaultUserHooks'
             (imported from Distribution.Simple):
             Deprecated: "Use simpleUserHooks or autoconfUserHooks, unless you need Cabal-1.2
             compatibility in which case you must stick with defaultUserHooks"
Preprocessing library X11-1.4.2...
Building X11-1.4.2...

Graphics/X11/Xlib/Event.hsc:70:7:
    Could not find module `Data.Generics':
      it is a member of package base-3.0.3.0, which is hidden
==> ERROR: Build Failed.
    Aborting...

Any ideas? smile

Last edited by andre.ramaciotti (2008-12-29 22:20:00)


(lambda ())

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB