[x11:run utility] gmrun

thegnu · 2004-08-17 13:18:04

I wanted a run program similar to the Gnome and Windows Run... commands, but I'm using pekwm. Enter gmrun.

# $Id: PKGBUILD,v 1.11 2004/08/12 17:15:31 thegnu Exp $
# Maintainer: Nathan Curry <thegnu@nathancurry.com> 
pkgname=gmrun
pkgver=0.9.2
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="a run program window with TAB completion"
url="http://sourceforge.net/projects/gmrun"
depends=()
source=(http://umn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/gmrun/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.gz)
md5sums=('6cef37a968006d9496fc56a7099c603c')

build() {
  cd $startdir/src/$pkgname-$pkgver
  ./configure --prefix=/usr
  make || return 1
  make prefix=$startdir/pkg/usr install
}

paranoos · 2004-08-31 18:27:41

yes! this is a fantastic program that I made a package for as well some time ago. this post isn't toooo old, so i don't mind bringing it back

couple minor details, the url should be
http://dynarch.com/mishoo/gmrun.epl

and the source should be
http://dl.sourceforge.net/ ... ...

and according to namcap, the dependencies should be (x-server gtk2 popt)

such a great program for those more minimal window managers that we all love. better than fbrun, too. i'd like to see this added to extra.

so... a PKGBUILD with all the changes I mentioned...

# $Id: PKGBUILD,v 1.11 2004/08/12 17:15:31 thegnu Exp $
# Maintainer: Nathan Curry <thegnu@nathancurry.com>
pkgname=gmrun
pkgver=0.9.2
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="GTK2 run dialog with TAB completion"
url="http://dynarch.com/mishoo/gmrun.epl"
depends=(x-server gtk2 popt)
source=(http://dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/gmrun/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.gz)
md5sums=('6cef37a968006d9496fc56a7099c603c')

build() {
  cd $startdir/src/$pkgname-$pkgver
  ./configure --prefix=/usr
  make || return 1
  make prefix=$startdir/pkg/usr install
}

punkrockguy318 · 2004-08-31 19:07:32

A couple things..

1) No license field
2) Your not the maintainer, your the contributor
3) You can a little more elegance to the source field

# Contributor: Nathan Curry <thegnu@nathancurry.com>
pkgname=gmrun
pkgver=0.9.2
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="GTK2 run dialog with TAB completion"
url="http://dynarch.com/mishoo/gmrun.epl"
license="GPL"
depends=(x-server gtk2 popt)
source=(http://dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/$pkgname/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.gz)
md5sums=('6cef37a968006d9496fc56a7099c603c')

build() {
  cd $startdir/src/$pkgname-$pkgver
  ./configure --prefix=/usr
  make || return 1
  make prefix=$startdir/pkg/usr install
}

Xentac · 2004-09-01 00:29:56

punkrockguy318 wrote:

A couple things..
1) No license field
2) Your not the maintainer, your the contributor
3) You can a little more elegance to the source field

A couple things...

1) Is there a standard for the license field yet?
2) You're not your, both times
3) Is it more elegant to type more or less?

punkrockguy318 · 2004-09-01 00:39:14

Xentac wrote:

punkrockguy318 wrote:
A couple things..
1) No license field
2) Your not the maintainer, your the contributor
3) You can a little more elegance to the source field
A couple things...
1) Is there a standard for the license field yet?
2) You're not your, both times
3) Is it more elegant to type more or less?

1) No standard, but it still serves a purpose regardless. The license field is a string that will let the user know what the license of the package is when he # pacman -Qi's it.
2) Some people have the spelling gene. Some people don't. I for one, don't. I actually had to stare at your post for about five minutes before figuring out what was wrong.
3) It's just three more characters?

Xentac · 2004-09-01 00:44:45

punkrockguy318 wrote:

Xentac wrote:
punkrockguy318 wrote:
A couple things..
1) No license field
2) Your not the maintainer, your the contributor
3) You can a little more elegance to the source field
A couple things...
1) Is there a standard for the license field yet?
2) You're not your, both times
3) Is it more elegant to type more or less?
1) No standard, but it still serves a purpose regardless. The license field is a string that will let the user know what the license of the package is when he # pacman -Qi's it.
2) Some people have the spelling gene. Some people don't. I for one, don't. I actually had to stare at your post for about five minutes before figuring out what was wrong.
3) It's just three more characters?

1) But imagine the amount of work to go around and fix all the broken ones when a standard is chosen.
2) I for one, don't should have been "I, for one, don't".
3) True, but that still doesn't answer the original question.

I'm just bugging you, you know. If you keep this up, so will I.

punkrockguy318 · 2004-09-01 02:49:03

Xentac wrote:

punkrockguy318 wrote:
Xentac wrote:
A couple things...
1) Is there a standard for the license field yet?
2) You're not your, both times
3) Is it more elegant to type more or less?
1) No standard, but it still serves a purpose regardless. The license field is a string that will let the user know what the license of the package is when he # pacman -Qi's it.
2) Some people have the spelling gene. Some people don't. I for one, don't. I actually had to stare at your post for about five minutes before figuring out what was wrong.
3) It's just three more characters?
1) But imagine the amount of work to go around and fix all the broken ones when a standard is chosen.
2) I for one, don't should have been "I, for one, don't".
3) True, but that still doesn't answer the original question.
I'm just bugging you, you know. If you keep this up, so will I.

Cool, let's give it another round.

1) How will it change? It's just a string...
2) I, used to, put commas all, over, the, place, so now, I'm not using, them, as much,
3) What if for some reason they change the name of the program to fooisbadforyourunningprogramsoftwarewithgtk2andpopt? That, I believe would be less typing

(I'm really poor at debating, I hope you know. I need practice.)
(I'm really poor at spelling, I hope you know. I need practice.)
(The list goes on....)

tehdely · 2004-09-01 07:32:46

Oh joy! Contrasutra is a grammar troll!

Count me in the fan club

Xentac · 2004-09-01 23:32:25

punkrockguy318 wrote:

Cool, let's give it another round.
1) How will it change? It's just a string...
2) I, used to, put commas all, over, the, place, so now, I'm not using, them, as much,
3) What if for some reason they change the name of the program to fooisbadforyourunningprogramsoftwarewithgtk2andpopt? That, I believe would be less typing
(I'm really poor at debating, I hope you know. I need practice.)
(I'm really poor at spelling, I hope you know. I need practice.)
(The list goes on....)

1) What if it becomes a URL that pacman uses to download licenses from? Read the bug tracker, it is a suggestion.
2) Ummm... I'm not even going to go there...
3) Well, it's just a simple cwfooisbadforyourunningprogramsoftwarewithgtk2andpopt<esc> to change the first and and a . to change the second one. Changing the name is a different issue, you still have to make sure the upgrade path is good, like adding replaces, etc. But yes, if the name of the program was originally that, $pkgname would be a more elegant solution.

tehdely wrote:

Oh joy! Contrasutra is a grammar troll!

Count me in the fan club

Seriously now, I don't see contrasutra anywhere in this thread. What are you talking about?

tehdely · 2004-09-02 04:11:55

Xentac wrote:

tehdely wrote:
Oh joy! Contrasutra is a grammar troll!

Count me in the fan club
Seriously now, I don't see contrasutra anywhere in this thread. What are you talking about?

Scrolled by too quickly. I meant you, lovely :oops:

Arch Linux

#1 2004-08-17 13:18:04

[x11:run utility] gmrun

#2 2004-08-31 18:27:41

Re: [x11:run utility] gmrun

#3 2004-08-31 19:07:32

Re: [x11:run utility] gmrun

#4 2004-09-01 00:29:56

Re: [x11:run utility] gmrun

#5 2004-09-01 00:39:14

Re: [x11:run utility] gmrun

#6 2004-09-01 00:44:45

Re: [x11:run utility] gmrun

#7 2004-09-01 02:49:03

Re: [x11:run utility] gmrun

#8 2004-09-01 07:32:46

Re: [x11:run utility] gmrun

#9 2004-09-01 23:32:25

Re: [x11:run utility] gmrun

#10 2004-09-02 04:11:55

Re: [x11:run utility] gmrun

Board footer