You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
My favorite pdf viewer on Windows has finally made it across to linux (in a usable state). I know it's closed source and everything, but damn it's fast. Thanks for posting it tdy!
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23344
![]()
Offline
Ah, good
I liked Foxit, too !
And I've just installed epdfviewer ! Where's that
'pacman -Rd'... ![]()
Deej
Offline
Thanks for posting it tdy!
oh hey I didn't notice this thread until now, cheers ![]()
Offline
wow, gret find
I actually preferred Foxit Reader in wine over linux pdf readers sometimes
Is it possible to get x64 package?
Last edited by alecmg (2009-01-23 13:04:39)
Xyne wrote:
"We've got Pacman. Wacka wacka, bitches!"
Offline
It doesn't save the page you were when you closed it.
This is the only reason I keep using evince.
(lambda ())
Offline
andre.ramciotti: I'm sure some Linux magic can workaround that. ![]()
Last edited by dav7 (2009-01-23 14:39:50)
Windows was made for looking at success from a distance through a wall of oversimplicity. Linux removes the wall, so you can just walk up to success and make it your own.
--
Reinventing the wheel is fun. You get to redefine pi.
Offline
Is it possible to get x64 package?
It works somewhat with lib32s.. it can display PDF files, but the interface is really butchered. It's not very usable (especially the "open" dialog), so I didn't include it in the PKGBUILD.
Last edited by tdy (2009-01-24 00:23:20)
Offline
Greate reader on Windows. Thanks for the heads up. Though it's not so greate on Linux yet.
Offline
cool, even if it is not very usable at the moment as you guys said.
one of my favs in windows.
let's hope they solve all problems.
EDIT: after a first look at some pdf-files they look better here than using other linux-pdf-viewers. ![]()
Last edited by koch (2009-01-24 00:16:03)
Offline
Yeah, it's a good news that now we have yet another lightweight PDF-viewer.
Foxit really seems to be fast and clear and has got all the necessary functions.
But I found one obvious disadvantage, while I was trying it out. It seems to me that Foxit renders fonts worse than Acroread.
To see what I'm talking about take a look at this screenshot:
Note how symbols rendered by Foxit (on the left side) differ from Acroread's ones. There are something like micro-blots making appearance of symbols unkempt.
I hope that developers are going to improve the quality of font rendering.
Offline
Pages: 1