You are not logged in.
Just realized I installed into a partition created on an extended partition. Any disadvantges/complexity by doing so? Thanks.
Offline
There's nothing wrong with that. Don't worry.
what goes up must come down
Offline
Nope. Your boot partition (/boot, with GRUB) must be on a primary partition - as long as you've done that, you're good.
Offline
Actually, you don't need to specify /boot as primary. When I set up arch not too long ago I set
/
/var
/swap
/home
as different partition. Obviously /boot is in / , but once you have your extended partition set up, you shouldn't really need to do anything different than you would if they were primary partitions.
Here's what my partition layout looks like, in case this helps anyone.
Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk identifier: 0xc3ffc3ff
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 1 16035 128793596 7 HPFS/NTFS
/dev/sda2 16035 24958 71680000 7 HPFS/NTFS
/dev/sda3 24958 30401 43721408+ 5 Extended
/dev/sda5 24958 26174 9767488+ 83 Linux
/dev/sda6 26174 26843 5373711 83 Linux
/dev/sda7 26843 27390 4393746 82 Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/sda8 27390 30401 24186337 83 Linux*see the extend shows up almost as a pointer to /dev/sda5 I believe. It is on /dev/sda5 where my /boot is located.
edit: but grub must be on ur primary, i.e sda (MBR) like Ranguvar said.
Last edited by MattSmith (2009-03-04 06:57:44)
A thing of beauty is a joy forever
-John Keats
Offline