interesting sound tools

dp · 2004-09-29 21:41:43

Professional Audio Tool for GNU/Linux
http://www.nongnu.org/protux/index.html

dp · 2004-09-29 21:45:20

QRT is a real-time soundfile mixing application modeled vaguely along the same lines as ProTools, at least in terms of visual editing of sound placement.

http://www.music.columbia.edu/~doug/qrt.html

dp · 2004-09-29 21:47:12

multitrack audio processing
http://www.wakkanet.fi/~kaiv/ecasound/

dp · 2004-09-29 21:47:57

terminatorX is a realtime audio synthesizer that allows you to "scratch" on digitally sampled audio data
http://www.terminatorx.cx/

dp · 2004-09-29 21:49:08

or if you are fox-fan:

http://rezound.sourceforge.net/

kakabaratruskia · 2004-09-29 21:50:28

audacity is... cool
http://audacity.sourceforge.net

dp · 2004-09-29 21:51:37

want to start your own radio station?

http://www.salemradiolabs.com/rivendell/

dp · 2004-09-29 21:53:52

kakabaratruskia wrote:

audacity is... cool
http://audacity.sourceforge.net

yes, it is

it is already in the repos: http://www.archlinux.org/packages.php?id=517

kth5 · 2004-10-01 07:53:44

"the closest native equivalent to Cubase® for Linux" ? Sound on Sound :shock:

http://www.rosegardenmusic.com/

i'd really like to see this in arch!

dp · 2004-10-04 17:04:29

kth5 wrote:

"the closest native equivalent to Cubase® for Linux" ? Sound on Sound :shock:
http://www.rosegardenmusic.com/
i'd really like to see this in arch!

rosegarden somehow do not want to compile against arch CURRENT (readline 5, gcc 3.4.2)

zeppelin · 2004-10-05 07:56:29

dp, very nice links indeed.
I hope we 'll see a frontend to lilypond in al [not especially rosegarden], and lilypond itself.

btw, is any of these apps, capable of reading and playing scores that were written via lilypond or maybe even MusicXML?

I'm looking for an app (even if it's closed source) that ideally would allow me to write music, listen to it, change sth, there re-listen to it and so on..
thanks

kth5 · 2004-10-05 08:16:36

dp wrote:

rosegarden somehow do not want to compile against arch CURRENT (readline 5, gcc 3.4.2)

hmm... well, i tried to compile the release version of rosegarden (0.9.9) just now and came across an error regarding a ";" too much in "gui/audiocommands.h" at the end of line 35. i simply removed it and it went further until it complained about a call to a private method of QCanvasPixmap. this is the exact output i get:

...snip...
cc1plus: warning: command line option "-Wmissing-prototypes" is valid for C/ObjC but not for C++
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/opt/kde/include -I/opt/qt/include -I/usr/X11R6/include  -I../base -I../sound -fexceptions -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/freetype2/config       -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT  -D_REENTRANT  -DRGKDE3 -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -Wall -pedantic -W -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -O2 -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-gcse -fexceptions -MT editviewbase.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/editviewbase.Tpo" 
  -c -o editviewbase.o `test -f 'editviewbase.cpp' || echo './'`editviewbase.cpp; 
then mv -f ".deps/editviewbase.Tpo" ".deps/editviewbase.Po"; 
else rm -f ".deps/editviewbase.Tpo"; exit 1; 
fi
cc1plus: warning: command line option "-Wmissing-prototypes" is valid for C/ObjC but not for C++
editviewbase.cpp: In member function `virtual void EditViewBase::setupActions(QString, bool)':
editviewbase.cpp:203: warning: `key' is deprecated (declared at /opt/kde/include/kstdaccel.h:452)
editviewbase.cpp:203: warning: `key' is deprecated (declared at /opt/kde/include/kstdaccel.h:452)
editviewbase.cpp:209: warning: `key' is deprecated (declared at /opt/kde/include/kstdaccel.h:452)
editviewbase.cpp:209: warning: `key' is deprecated (declared at /opt/kde/include/kstdaccel.h:452)
/opt/qt/include/qcanvas.h:419: error: `QCanvasPixmap::QCanvasPixmap(const QCanvasPixmap&)' is private
editviewbase.cpp:215: error: within this context
/opt/qt/include/qcanvas.h:419: error: `QCanvasPixmap::QCanvasPixmap(const QCanvasPixmap&)' is private
editviewbase.cpp:220: error: within this context
/opt/qt/include/qcanvas.h:419: error: `QCanvasPixmap::QCanvasPixmap(const QCanvasPixmap&)' is private
editviewbase.cpp:225: error: within this context
make[3]: *** [editviewbase.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/kth5/code/rosegarden/rosegarden-4-0.9.9/gui'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/kth5/code/rosegarden/rosegarden-4-0.9.9/gui'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/kth5/code/rosegarden/rosegarden-4-0.9.9'
make: *** [all] Error 2
[kth5@subhime rosegarden-4-0.9.9]$

any ideas?

dp · 2004-10-05 12:50:37

kth5 wrote:

dp wrote:

rosegarden somehow do not want to compile against arch CURRENT (readline 5, gcc 3.4.2)

hmm... well, i tried to compile the release version of rosegarden (0.9.9) just now and came across an error regarding a ";" too much in "gui/audiocommands.h" at the end of line 35. i simply removed it and it went further until it complained about a call to a private method of QCanvasPixmap. this is the exact output i get:

...snip...
cc1plus: warning: command line option "-Wmissing-prototypes" is valid for C/ObjC but not for C++
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/opt/kde/include -I/opt/qt/include -I/usr/X11R6/include  -I../base -I../sound -fexceptions -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/freetype2/config       -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT  -D_REENTRANT  -DRGKDE3 -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -Wall -pedantic -W -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -O2 -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-gcse -fexceptions -MT editviewbase.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/editviewbase.Tpo" 
  -c -o editviewbase.o `test -f 'editviewbase.cpp' || echo './'`editviewbase.cpp; 
then mv -f ".deps/editviewbase.Tpo" ".deps/editviewbase.Po"; 
else rm -f ".deps/editviewbase.Tpo"; exit 1; 
fi
cc1plus: warning: command line option "-Wmissing-prototypes" is valid for C/ObjC but not for C++
editviewbase.cpp: In member function `virtual void EditViewBase::setupActions(QString, bool)':
editviewbase.cpp:203: warning: `key' is deprecated (declared at /opt/kde/include/kstdaccel.h:452)
editviewbase.cpp:203: warning: `key' is deprecated (declared at /opt/kde/include/kstdaccel.h:452)
editviewbase.cpp:209: warning: `key' is deprecated (declared at /opt/kde/include/kstdaccel.h:452)
editviewbase.cpp:209: warning: `key' is deprecated (declared at /opt/kde/include/kstdaccel.h:452)
/opt/qt/include/qcanvas.h:419: error: `QCanvasPixmap::QCanvasPixmap(const QCanvasPixmap&)' is private
editviewbase.cpp:215: error: within this context
/opt/qt/include/qcanvas.h:419: error: `QCanvasPixmap::QCanvasPixmap(const QCanvasPixmap&)' is private
editviewbase.cpp:220: error: within this context
/opt/qt/include/qcanvas.h:419: error: `QCanvasPixmap::QCanvasPixmap(const QCanvasPixmap&)' is private
editviewbase.cpp:225: error: within this context
make[3]: *** [editviewbase.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/kth5/code/rosegarden/rosegarden-4-0.9.9/gui'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/kth5/code/rosegarden/rosegarden-4-0.9.9/gui'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/kth5/code/rosegarden/rosegarden-4-0.9.9'
make: *** [all] Error 2
[kth5@subhime rosegarden-4-0.9.9]$

any ideas?

have a look here:

http://cvs.archlinux.org/cgi-bin/viewcv … root=Extra

you will need this patch and this PKGBUILD for a start, but it still has a trouble i had no time yet to look closer behind

dp · 2004-10-05 12:54:22

zeppelin wrote:

dp, very nice links indeed.
I hope we 'll see a frontend to lilypond in al [not especially rosegarden], and lilypond itself.
btw, is any of these apps, capable of reading and playing scores that were written via lilypond or maybe even MusicXML?
I'm looking for an app (even if it's closed source) that ideally would allow me to write music, listen to it, change sth, there re-listen to it and so on..
thanks

lilypond and the others, i will work on, when find some time to spend - the app you are searching, i'm searching too --- on a floppy i have a dos-app that is only running on dos 4.0.2 and works great writing notes and directly playing them on a soundblaster 8 --- unfortunately this capella do not work on dosbox and i had to burry it --- till now i didn't find any equivalent

anyone to find some note-editor with listening-possibility, please let us know

dp · 2004-10-05 16:38:42

dp wrote:

zeppelin wrote:
dp, very nice links indeed.
I hope we 'll see a frontend to lilypond in al [not especially rosegarden], and lilypond itself.
btw, is any of these apps, capable of reading and playing scores that were written via lilypond or maybe even MusicXML?
I'm looking for an app (even if it's closed source) that ideally would allow me to write music, listen to it, change sth, there re-listen to it and so on..
thanks
lilypond and the others, i will work on, when find some time to spend - the app you are searching, i'm searching too --- on a floppy i have a dos-app that is only running on dos 4.0.2 and works great writing notes and directly playing them on a soundblaster 8 --- unfortunately this capella do not work on dosbox and i had to burry it --- till now i didn't find any equivalent
anyone to find some note-editor with listening-possibility, please let us know

this can be the solution:

http://developer.berlios.de/projects/noteedit/

i didn't yet tried it but will

judfilm · 2005-08-09 11:59:16

TerminatorX is now http://www.terminatorx.org/

Arch Linux

#1 2004-09-29 21:41:43

interesting sound tools

#2 2004-09-29 21:45:20

Re: interesting sound tools

#3 2004-09-29 21:47:12

Re: interesting sound tools

#4 2004-09-29 21:47:57

Re: interesting sound tools

#5 2004-09-29 21:49:08

Re: interesting sound tools

#6 2004-09-29 21:50:28

Re: interesting sound tools

#7 2004-09-29 21:51:37

Re: interesting sound tools

#8 2004-09-29 21:53:52

Re: interesting sound tools

#9 2004-10-01 07:53:44

Re: interesting sound tools

#10 2004-10-04 17:04:29

Re: interesting sound tools

#11 2004-10-05 07:56:29

Re: interesting sound tools

#12 2004-10-05 08:16:36

Re: interesting sound tools

#13 2004-10-05 12:50:37

Re: interesting sound tools

#14 2004-10-05 12:54:22

Re: interesting sound tools

#15 2004-10-05 16:38:42

Re: interesting sound tools

#16 2005-08-09 11:59:16

Re: interesting sound tools

Board footer