Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

mchlbk · 2009-05-15 21:10:23

Hi,

I'm currently testing Xubuntu+LXDE on my new netbook in stead of the WinXP os that came with it.

Someone suggested I considered giving Arch a try. I have no Arch experience at all - is Arch a good OS for netbooks?

It has the Atom processor, 1 gb ram, 160 gb hd and 8,9" screen. (And no disk drive.)

Mr.Elendig · 2009-05-15 21:21:14

Arch is what _you_ make it. Lots of people runs arch on their netbooks.

lucke · 2009-05-15 21:28:04

It surely is suitable for a netbook (I'm running it on my Wind), it'd probably run faster than *buntu stuff and would be easier to make fit to your needs. Arch needs some time and effort to get running. though - although the only skill needed is the ability to read - read the wiki for more information.

Lexion · 2009-05-15 22:43:35

+1 to all

madalu · 2009-05-15 22:53:14

I installed Arch on my Asus EEE 1000he and everything works fantastically. The advantage of a rolling release like Arch is that it's easy to get the most recent kernel (which helps when you're using the newest netbooks).

I found that I had to read about the same amount online to install Arch as I did to install Ubuntu --- but the difference was that I actually learned a lot of linux fundamentals when installing Arch.

Last edited by madalu (2009-05-15 22:53:57)

SteveB · 2009-05-15 23:04:47

Absolutely it is. I'm running it on my MSI Wind U100+ and wouldn't consider sticking anything else on it. Arch is it!

flammenwurfer · 2009-05-15 23:19:54

I am also running Arch (with KDE 4.2.3) on my MSI Wind. It works fantastically. Like others have said, you can make Arch whatever want it to be. The Beginners Guide is an excellent tool when installing for the first time.

will1911a1 · 2009-05-16 02:29:34

Posting this in Arch on my Eee 701. Everything works great and it's much nicer than the Xandros install that came with it.

tomd123 · 2009-05-16 03:47:41

Arch is great for netbooks and older computers too. I'm running it on a pIII 450mhz. it's a little slow when doing large operations, but what do you expect

iphitus · 2009-05-16 11:57:35

madalu wrote:

I installed Arch on my Asus EEE 1000he and everything works fantastically. The advantage of a rolling release like Arch is that it's easy to get the most recent kernel (which helps when you're using the newest netbooks).
I found that I had to read about the same amount online to install Arch as I did to install Ubuntu --- but the difference was that I actually learned a lot of linux fundamentals when installing Arch.

Just installed it on my brand new 1000HE too.

mchlbk · 2009-05-16 12:29:40

Thanks to all of you for the input - I'll give it a try. I'll probably play around with it in a virtual machine before removing XP though...

thayer · 2009-05-16 16:27:15

mchlbk wrote:

Thanks to all of you for the input - I'll give it a try. I'll probably play around with it in a virtual machine before removing XP though...

FWIW I just left my XP partition, but resized it to 20GB as a "just in case" precaution. Some classes I take require me to install win32 applications and they don't always work so well (or at all) with Wine/Crossover. That still leaves me with about 115GB for Arch...more than enough for my needs.

leo2501 · 2009-06-13 22:57:39

is there a way to load the base arch system & some apps to ram? like damn small linux and tiny core do? i tryed tiny core linux on my wind today and it amazed me how much faster it is compared to all other things i tested... so if we can get arch & some apps that will be amazing for sure

Console · 2009-06-13 23:49:34

I am going to try Arch on my EeePC 701. It has 4GB SSD, 512MB ram, and 900mhz CPU. I am sure it will run fine.

heleos · 2009-06-14 00:16:47

Arch on my eee904 runs flawlessly out of the box.

Cotton · 2009-06-14 00:24:51

http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Eee

casperh · 2009-07-07 13:41:29

madalu wrote:

I installed Arch on my Asus EEE 1000he and everything works fantastically. The advantage of a rolling release like Arch is that it's easy to get the most recent kernel (which helps when you're using the newest netbooks).
I found that I had to read about the same amount online to install Arch as I did to install Ubuntu --- but the difference was that I actually learned a lot of linux fundamentals when installing Arch.

How's the battery life? Considering to buy an Asus EEE 1000HE myself

barzam · 2009-07-08 06:40:47

I use Arch on my Eeepc 900, works great of course. As was said above: Arch is what you make it!

TigTex · 2009-07-08 15:57:16

I'm using arch linux on my little brothers intel classmate pc (aka magalhaes) and it runs perfectly, way better than "caixa magica", a portuguese disto, biuck.

celeron 900mhz, 30gb HDD 4.2krpm. intel915gm

Last edited by TigTex (2009-07-08 15:57:57)

arkham · 2009-07-08 18:43:01

Use of a tiling WM suggested.

whordijk · 2009-07-08 19:39:34

arkham wrote:

Use of a tiling WM suggested.

Why would a tiling WM be recommendable? Netbooks have relatively small screens: what would be the benefits of a tiling WM?

moljac024 · 2009-07-08 21:25:31

whordijk wrote:

arkham wrote:
Use of a tiling WM suggested.
Why would a tiling WM be recommendable? Netbooks have relatively small screens: what would be the benefits of a tiling WM?

Probably the lack of window decorations, and that you can still use a layout that maximizes every window, but you can do that with any other WM...

rine · 2009-07-09 14:41:17

moljac024 wrote:

whordijk wrote:
arkham wrote:
Use of a tiling WM suggested.
Why would a tiling WM be recommendable? Netbooks have relatively small screens: what would be the benefits of a tiling WM?
Probably the lack of window decorations, and that you can still use a layout that maximizes every window, but you can do that with any other WM...

And, when you get used to it, a keyboard is faster than a mouse, and probably much faster than a touchpad. If I should ever use a touchpad to move windows I'd kill myself D:

moljac024 · 2009-07-09 14:58:51

rine wrote:

moljac024 wrote:
whordijk wrote:
Why would a tiling WM be recommendable? Netbooks have relatively small screens: what would be the benefits of a tiling WM?
Probably the lack of window decorations, and that you can still use a layout that maximizes every window, but you can do that with any other WM...
And, when you get used to it, a keyboard is faster than a mouse, and probably much faster than a touchpad. If I should ever use a touchpad to move windows I'd kill myself D:

You do know you can plug an usb mouse in a laptop ?
There are even mice designed for laptop use, such as mice that are smaller, have retractable cords etc..

scio · 2009-07-09 15:02:26

Ever try using a mouse with a netbook on your lap? Not a good combo, I would also highly recommend a tiling WM, currently using awesome on my Eee.

Arch Linux

#1 2009-05-15 21:10:23

Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

#2 2009-05-15 21:21:14

Re: Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

#3 2009-05-15 21:28:04

Re: Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

#4 2009-05-15 22:43:35

Re: Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

#5 2009-05-15 22:53:14

Re: Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

#6 2009-05-15 23:04:47

Re: Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

#7 2009-05-15 23:19:54

Re: Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

#8 2009-05-16 02:29:34

Re: Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

#9 2009-05-16 03:47:41

Re: Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

#10 2009-05-16 11:57:35

Re: Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

#11 2009-05-16 12:29:40

Re: Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

#12 2009-05-16 16:27:15

Re: Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

#13 2009-06-13 22:57:39

Re: Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

#14 2009-06-13 23:49:34

Re: Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

#15 2009-06-14 00:16:47

Re: Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

#16 2009-06-14 00:24:51

Re: Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

#17 2009-07-07 13:41:29

Re: Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

#18 2009-07-08 06:40:47

Re: Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

#19 2009-07-08 15:57:16

Re: Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

#20 2009-07-08 18:43:01

Re: Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

#21 2009-07-08 19:39:34

Re: Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

#22 2009-07-08 21:25:31

Re: Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

#23 2009-07-09 14:41:17

Re: Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

#24 2009-07-09 14:58:51

Re: Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

#25 2009-07-09 15:02:26

Re: Is Arch suitable for a netbook?

Board footer