[new] aMule 2.0.0rc6

Searinox · 2004-10-10 11:55:23

Here's a pkgbuild for the newest aMule release:

# Contributor: Henrik Ronellenfitsch <searinox@web.de>
pkgname=amule
pkgver=2.0.0rc6
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="aMule is a eMule-like client for ed2k p2p network"
url="http://www.amule.org"
license="GPL"
depends=('wxgtk' 'curl>=7.9.5' 'libjpeg' 'libtiff' 'perl' 'xorg' 'gd>=2.0.0')
source=(http://download.berlios.de/amule/aMule-$pkgver.tar.gz)
md5sums=(c05aac05c39f5a681f2fe4a22dd30426)

build() {
  cd $startdir/src/aMule-$pkgver
  ./configure --prefix=/usr
  make || return 1
  make prefix=$startdir/pkg/usr install
}

dp · 2004-10-10 13:10:44

any idea when the release will come out? is the rc6 usable for daily use?

riddler · 2004-10-11 15:35:30

how to use this pkgbuild-script?

celeron2002 · 2004-10-11 18:00:25

create a PKGBUILD file, paste the text to the file, and execute makepkg in the PKGBUILD's directory.

aMule rc6, run perfectly, dont worry

oscar · 2004-10-11 19:40:50

I'm a DC person, but I think I will test this network and see if I can find any proper releases ^^

dp · 2004-10-11 20:15:44

celeron2002 wrote:

aMule rc6, run perfectly, dont worry

i asked because i wanted to include it to extra repository but myself do not use it (because of my slow connection) and cannot test it for long

freakyc · 2004-10-22 18:39:26

aMule 2.0.0rc7 is out now. In regards to whether it's ready, 1.2.8 (which I'd been using since the 2.0.0 RCs I'd had problems with, but the problem is supposed to be fixed in rc7) no longer seemed to be downloading/uploading for me. Maybe it was just me, but I also tried changing my ports, and now 2.0.0 seems to be working alright. I'm just testing it now to see whether that bug is really fixed.

BTW, the bug was connections not being dropped properly through my linux router, causing ip_conntrack to fill up, which made it pretty much drop all packets sent to the router. This was after closing aMule even.

celeron2002 · 2004-10-22 22:14:08

dp wrote:

celeron2002 wrote:
aMule rc6, run perfectly, dont worry
i asked because i wanted to include it to extra repository but myself do not use it (because of my slow connection) and cannot test it for long

include aMule rc7 in the extra repository would be excellent , is very usable and stable.
The only problem is when wxGTK is linked against gtk2, aMule consume a lot of memory :? :? , but this problem will be fixed in the next version of wxGTK

freakyc · 2004-10-23 20:19:31

Anyone who is using this and has a linux router setup, this is the thread I've tagged on to in the amule bugs forum: http://forum.amule.org/thread.php?threadid=3095&sid=
I'd like to know if it's just me having this problem :?

Oh, and changing the rc6 to rc7 in the pkgver works fine.

Skee · 2004-11-01 20:40:53

Since rc5, amule no longer depends on libcrypto/Crypto++.
Altho the current pkgbuild states that it is...

http://www.amule.org/wiki/index.php/Libcrypto

dp · 2004-11-01 22:01:07

Skee wrote:

Since rc5, amule no longer depends on libcrypto/Crypto++.
Altho the current pkgbuild states that it is...
http://www.amule.org/wiki/index.php/Libcrypto

from this link:
"all necessary Crypto++ code is embedded in aMule's source to avoid conflicts with some distros"

yes, but we do not have any conflicts (we run the newest crypto++) and therefore i built amule with --disable-embedded_crypto what makes it use the crypto++ in archlinux

kritoke · 2004-11-02 17:31:27

Do you think that amule should be removed from staging now that it is in extra?

Kritoke

celeron2002 · 2004-11-02 18:59:13

kritoke wrote:

Do you think that amule should be removed from staging now that it is in extra?
Kritoke

of corse, the package in the staging repository only wasts MBs

Arch Linux

#1 2004-10-10 11:55:23

[new] aMule 2.0.0rc6

#2 2004-10-10 13:10:44

Re: [new] aMule 2.0.0rc6

#3 2004-10-11 15:35:30

Re: [new] aMule 2.0.0rc6

#4 2004-10-11 18:00:25

Re: [new] aMule 2.0.0rc6

#5 2004-10-11 19:40:50

Re: [new] aMule 2.0.0rc6

#6 2004-10-11 20:15:44

Re: [new] aMule 2.0.0rc6

#7 2004-10-22 18:39:26

Re: [new] aMule 2.0.0rc6

#8 2004-10-22 22:14:08

Re: [new] aMule 2.0.0rc6

#9 2004-10-23 20:19:31

Re: [new] aMule 2.0.0rc6

#10 2004-11-01 20:40:53

Re: [new] aMule 2.0.0rc6

#11 2004-11-01 22:01:07

Re: [new] aMule 2.0.0rc6

#12 2004-11-02 17:31:27

Re: [new] aMule 2.0.0rc6

#13 2004-11-02 18:59:13

Re: [new] aMule 2.0.0rc6

Board footer