You are not logged in.
Hi all!
I'm doing an update of 1,2gb (yeah, I often save it up for months).
An because of my lousy connection speed, the idea of using bzip2 compression instead of gzip came to my mind.
I think for most users the connection speed and not cpu is the bottleneck... maybe make a poll?
Plus this would disburden the mirror server because of lesser traffic.
What do you think of it?
Offline
First, find that 1.2 GB in your cache folder, gunzip each and bzip2 each. How much does it save?
Offline
I believe there are plans to use tar.xs (lzma, like 7zip) > http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch … 11776.html
Offline
You might as well use xz - takes even less space, and sure as hell be done a lot quicker .
Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy
Offline