You are not logged in.

#1 2009-07-11 16:17:04

slenkar
Member
Registered: 2009-07-11
Posts: 56

i686 or x86_64?

I thought I knew a thing or 2 about computers but this has me confused.

I have an older system from 1999 but Im not sure which version of arch linux to download

Offline

#2 2009-07-11 16:21:48

iggy
Member
From: Germany, L.E. - Leipzig
Registered: 2004-10-17
Posts: 367

Re: i686 or x86_64?

if it supports 64bit than try x86_64.
you can find more information here:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch64_FAQ


sorry for my bad english smile

Offline

#3 2009-07-11 16:46:48

Vladman
Member
Registered: 2009-01-28
Posts: 118

Re: i686 or x86_64?

you need archlinux-2009.02-core-i686.iso

Offline

#4 2009-07-11 17:08:50

z.s.tar.gz
Member
From: Rural Florida
Registered: 2008-12-12
Posts: 298

Re: i686 or x86_64?

Try 32 bit, as both 32 and 64 bit processors can handle it, and seeing as the computer is from '99, it shouldn't have enough ram to make 64 bit worth it anyways.


I need to find a way out so everyone can find their way out.
Resregietd Lunix Uesr: 485581

Offline

#5 2009-07-11 17:45:52

graysky
Wiki Maintainer
From: :wq
Registered: 2008-12-01
Posts: 10,597
Website

Re: i686 or x86_64?

z.s.tar.gz wrote:

Try 32 bit, as both 32 and 64 bit processors can handle it, and seeing as the computer is from '99, it shouldn't have enough ram to make 64 bit worth it anyways.

+1 for this statement.  x64 is really when you need >4 gigs of memory.  What are your hardware specs by the way?

Last edited by graysky (2009-07-11 17:46:12)


CPU-optimized Linux-ck packages @ Repo-ck  • AUR packagesZsh and other configs

Offline

#6 2009-07-11 19:23:51

slenkar
Member
Registered: 2009-07-11
Posts: 56

Re: i686 or x86_64?

32-bit pentium 600mhz 128MB of RAM

Offline

#7 2009-07-11 19:31:37

lifeafter2am
Member
From: 127.0.0.1
Registered: 2009-06-10
Posts: 1,332

Re: i686 or x86_64?

slenkar wrote:

32-bit pentium 600mhz 128MB of RAM

Yeah .... definitely 32bit.


#binarii @ irc.binarii.net
Matrix Server: https://matrix.binarii.net
-------------
Allan -> ArchBang is not supported because it is stupid.

Offline

#8 2009-07-11 19:37:19

djszapi
Member
From: Cambridge, United Kingdom
Registered: 2009-06-14
Posts: 1,439
Website

Re: i686 or x86_64?

Slenkar: 32 bit absolutely:

There aren't all the program for 64 first of all, and when i've developed for a 32 bit target processor, on 64 bit host, there were so much confusing crash.

Yeah, 64 is maybe quciker, but it's not so important me, like stability, compatilibity, and in this case you haven't got so much choosing smile

Offline

#9 2009-07-11 19:59:09

Mr.Elendig
#archlinux@freenode channel op
From: The intertubes
Registered: 2004-11-07
Posts: 4,092

Re: i686 or x86_64?

Stability is in my experience just as good on 64bit. The only real deciding factor in this case, is the fact that his hardware does not support 64bit, so he can't use it even if he want to.


Evil #archlinux@libera.chat channel op and general support dude.
. files on github, Screenshots, Random pics and the rest

Offline

#10 2009-07-11 20:02:44

slenkar
Member
Registered: 2009-07-11
Posts: 56

Re: i686 or x86_64?

i just had to make sure that i686 wasnt too advanced  thanks

Last edited by slenkar (2009-07-11 20:02:59)

Offline

#11 2009-07-11 20:18:57

Mr.Elendig
#archlinux@freenode channel op
From: The intertubes
Registered: 2004-11-07
Posts: 4,092

Re: i686 or x86_64?

600MHz sounds like PIII, and it is i686. You can cat /proc/cpuinfo to be sure. (or just open the case and have a look)


Evil #archlinux@libera.chat channel op and general support dude.
. files on github, Screenshots, Random pics and the rest

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB