You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I'm sitting here very early in the morning looking at the logo and have finally seen what I consider a discrepancy in the Arch logo. Tell me if I'm wrong but don't you see Aarch? Shouldn't it just be
Offline
nope, because not everyone recognizes that the logo describes the letter "a" at first glance.
Offline
Either way looks fine to me. arch0r drives a good point home as well.
Offline
It's a designing rule that once a stylized logo letter reaches an unreadability level of over 9000, you have to spell it out.
Offline
It's better the way it is. Arch has the coolest name and the most simple yet beautiful logo than other distros.
True !
ktr
Offline
I never noticed that the arch was an A. wow.
urxvtc / wmii / zsh / configs / onebluecat.net
Arch will not hold your hand
Offline
I can see how the logo resembles the letter A, yet I don't read "Aarch Linux". How funny is that? I think the logo just doesn't blend in as a letter with "arch linux", since it is in such a different style.
Offline
I'd never thought about that. But the logo isn't enough of a real 'A' for it to be read as "Aarchlinux" in my opinion. It's fine the way it is I think
Offline
It's Aarchlinux, because it's Aaron's.
"I'm Winston Wolfe. I solve problems."
~ Need moar games? [arch-games] ~ [aurcheck] AUR haz updates? ~
Offline
It's Aarchlinux, because it's Aaron's.
The logo change did happen soon after the shift in power , although the old logo had the same issue.
Last edited by rson451 (2009-07-30 12:10:18)
archlinux - please read this and this — twice — then ask questions.
--
http://rsontech.net | http://github.com/rson
Offline
Pages: 1