You are not logged in.
During a recent system upgrade Subversion was upgraded from 1.6.3 to 1.6.4. After the upgrade I couldn't get to the repository through my web server. The log file has this error repeated: Failed to load module for FS type 'bdb'. Using svnadmin and svnlook gave the same errors.
I went back into /var/cache/pacman/pkg and reinstalled 1.6.3. After that everything was working fine.
Can anyone confirm? Should a bug report be opened?
Was this subversion 1.6.4 package compiled without BDB support? Was that intentional or an oversight?
Matthew
Brampton ON
Offline
Hello tazboy78!
"Was this subversion 1.6.4 package compiled without BDB support? -> You can here the options for configure script.
http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/s … iew=markup
It seems in last case you need for converting bdb to fsfs format with svnadmin e.g.:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.5/svn. … nt.migrate
Offline
During a recent system upgrade Subversion was upgraded from 1.6.3 to 1.6.4. After the upgrade I couldn't get to the repository through my web server. The log file has this error repeated: Failed to load module for FS type 'bdb'. Using svnadmin and svnlook gave the same errors.
I went back into /var/cache/pacman/pkg and reinstalled 1.6.3. After that everything was working fine.
Can anyone confirm? Should a bug report be opened?
Was this subversion 1.6.4 package compiled without BDB support? Was that intentional or an oversight?
I remember seeing warnings about bdb being not enabled when I was compiling subversion for the ruby-1.9 update so I never uploaded my version and asked the maintainer to look at it. I guess the same warning was missed when updating to 1.6.4. File a bug report.
Offline
Allan, I opened bug report 15972.
djszapi, In the past my repository was FSFS, but when I upgraded to subversion 1.6 I had trouble connecting through Apache. Once I converted to BDB all the problems went away. I hesitate to convert it back at this point.
Matthew
Offline