You are not logged in.

#1 2009-11-23 14:25:52

cola
Member
Registered: 2009-11-20
Posts: 63

pacman -S vim , problem

resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...

Targets (1): vim-7.2.266-1

Total Download Size:    0.00 MB
Total Installed Size:   28.69 MB

Proceed with installation? [Y/n] Y
checking package integrity...
(1/1) checking for file conflicts                   [##################################################################] 100%
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
vim: /usr/bin/rview exists in filesystem
Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.

Offline

#2 2009-11-23 14:29:53

sr
Member
Registered: 2009-10-12
Posts: 51

Re: pacman -S vim , problem

From the news:

http://www.archlinux.org/news/464/

I repost that, because now it will affect all users. In order to get the new vim layout installed you will have to remove some symlinks from the system:

Finally, the new vi* packages are up. There will be a little migration pain. For optimal results, I recommend to "sudo rm /usr/bin/{view,rview}" before you run "sudo pacman -Syu"

Offline

#3 2009-11-23 14:31:52

vik_k
Member
From: Pune, India
Registered: 2009-07-12
Posts: 227
Website

Re: pacman -S vim , problem

iirc , i had deleted the rview link & when you'll install vim, it'll be recreated.

so you can delete the rview for now.

edit: i was late

Last edited by vik_k (2009-11-23 14:33:16)


"First learn computer science and all the theory. Next develop a programming style. Then forget all that and just hack." ~ George Carrette

Offline

#4 2010-02-08 14:44:42

stabu
Member
Registered: 2010-01-14
Posts: 19

Re: pacman -S vim , problem

I've been trying a week to install vim unsuccessfully (due to the above conflicts). Each time I thought it was due to all the upgrading going on, so I just "tried again later".

For example this waiting tactic worked with emacs ... I also got conflicts with it, but they cleared.

Interesting to see it was a case of  "legacy symlinks" causing the problem with vim ... "vi" was pointing to "ex". Ha! I suppose it could have been worse ... could have been pointing to "ed". Have got to have come from somewhere, those links.

Last edited by stabu (2010-02-08 14:45:05)


((marry*)(char* _hername_, char* _myname_)) = (hell<0º)? 1:0;

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB