You are not logged in.

#1 2009-12-16 07:17:29

SoleSoul
Member
From: Israel
Registered: 2009-06-29
Posts: 319

Chromium hits Extra

Yay!
Wanted to say thank you team!

Offline

#2 2009-12-16 07:26:50

combuster
Member
From: Serbia
Registered: 2008-09-30
Posts: 711
Website

Re: Chromium hits Extra

Yeah, that's great, a lot easier then installing dev snapshots all the time smile Thnx Pierre ! Been waiting for this...

Offline

#3 2009-12-16 07:38:03

foutrelis
Developer
From: Athens, Greece
Registered: 2008-07-28
Posts: 705
Website

Re: Chromium hits Extra

I must say, Chromium runs amazingly smoothly on my netbook, despite its slow SSD. /me happy tongue

Thanks Pierre.

Offline

#4 2009-12-16 07:59:53

Dead Code
Member
Registered: 2009-01-18
Posts: 227

Re: Chromium hits Extra

Its working like a dream. Thanks to pierre smile

Offline

#5 2009-12-16 10:04:55

stryder
Member
Registered: 2009-02-28
Posts: 500

Re: Chromium hits Extra

Thanks... have been wanting to try this.

Offline

#6 2009-12-16 13:05:14

monshin
Member
Registered: 2008-01-14
Posts: 30

Re: Chromium hits Extra

Thanks! I use ir since it was on testing, and work great!

Offline

#7 2009-12-16 16:04:41

fluffylime
Member
From: Russia, Moscow
Registered: 2009-04-03
Posts: 47

Re: Chromium hits Extra

According to PKBUILD, there is a patch, disabling SSE2 to suppport i686.
Now i'm using chromium-browser-bin from AUR, which in turn uses prebuild chromium from it's website (buildbot.chromium.org). Does anybody know whether it uses this patch too?
Also not sure if turning off SSE2 will decrease performance...


English is not my native language, sorry.

Offline

#8 2009-12-16 16:10:25

flamelab
Member
From: Athens, Hellas (Greece)
Registered: 2007-12-26
Posts: 2,160

Re: Chromium hits Extra

fluffylime wrote:

According to PKBUILD, there is a patch, disabling SSE2 to suppport i686.
Now i'm using chromium-browser-bin from AUR, which in turn uses prebuild chromium from it's website (buildbot.chromium.org). Does anybody know whether it uses this patch too?
Also not sure if turning off SSE2 will decrease performance...

It is disabled because SSE2 is not a part of the i686 instruction set. And it causes problems on CPUs without SSE2 support.

Offline

#9 2009-12-16 16:29:26

fluffylime
Member
From: Russia, Moscow
Registered: 2009-04-03
Posts: 47

Re: Chromium hits Extra

flamelab wrote:

It is disabled because SSE2 is not a part of the i686 instruction set. And it causes problems on CPUs without SSE2 support.

I know this (may be I was too brief in my previous post, saying "...disabling SSE2 to suppport i686...").
My question was "Are chromium builds from its developers have this patch applied?" smile

Last edited by fluffylime (2009-12-16 16:29:53)


English is not my native language, sorry.

Offline

#10 2009-12-16 17:26:32

ozar
Member
From: USA
Registered: 2005-02-18
Posts: 1,686

Re: Chromium hits Extra

Ouch... just tried it for a couple of hours and didn't like Chromium at all!

Very glad it's out there so for those that do like it, and of course any competition and ideas spread between browser developers is a good thing.

This user is back to Firefox, at least for now.  smile


oz

Offline

#11 2009-12-16 17:44:09

Pierre
Developer
From: Bonn
Registered: 2004-07-05
Posts: 1,964
Website

Re: Chromium hits Extra

About the SSE2 thing: Our i686 package has to be build without SSE2 support simply because i686 compatible CPUs might not have these instruction set (e.g. Athlon, Pentium II etc.). This does not affect x86_64 of course which has enabled SSE2 anyway.

In this case SSE2 is only needed to pass some layout tests; the official Chromium does not need SSE2 neither. (see the config file)

Offline

#12 2009-12-16 18:19:33

fluffylime
Member
From: Russia, Moscow
Registered: 2009-04-03
Posts: 47

Re: Chromium hits Extra

Pierre wrote:

In this case SSE2 is only needed to pass some layout tests; the official Chromium does not need SSE2 neither.

That's great. smile I'm going to install package from [extra] instead of AUR. Thank you!

Last edited by fluffylime (2009-12-16 18:20:30)


English is not my native language, sorry.

Offline

#13 2009-12-16 22:37:55

some-guy94
Member
Registered: 2009-08-15
Posts: 360

Re: Chromium hits Extra

The buildbot builds chromium with SSE2 enabled.

Offline

#14 2009-12-16 22:52:00

Pierre
Developer
From: Bonn
Registered: 2004-07-05
Posts: 1,964
Website

Re: Chromium hits Extra

of course; otherwise it wont pass the layout tests. But the chrome release is build without SSE.

Offline

#15 2009-12-16 22:57:13

mechmg93
Member
From: Greece
Registered: 2007-05-23
Posts: 197

Re: Chromium hits Extra

Nice! i already replaced firefox and now i use chromium. the only problem is that using kde4 i cannot set it as default browser cause in every begining it continues asking..

Last edited by mechmg93 (2009-12-16 22:58:34)


Mikes on AUR

Offline

#16 2009-12-17 04:32:06

defrysk
Member
From: Barrie, Ontario
Registered: 2008-12-15
Posts: 42
Website

Re: Chromium hits Extra

I like chromium, but google-chrome uses less resources so google-chrome is my preferred browser.

Offline

#17 2009-12-17 07:24:25

hockeyfighter09
Member
Registered: 2009-07-04
Posts: 48

Re: Chromium hits Extra

I am having trouble installing chromium.  When I type "pacman -Ss chromium" the only thing that comes up is a shooter game?  It says my extra repo is up to date, could that be the problem?  The repo I am using hasnt synced yet?  BTW I am using the unixheads repo.

Offline

#18 2009-12-17 08:11:51

guzz46
Member
From: New Zealand
Registered: 2009-06-18
Posts: 190

Re: Chromium hits Extra

Try using a different mirror, such as schlunix

Offline

#19 2009-12-17 08:16:36

Pierre
Developer
From: Bonn
Registered: 2004-07-05
Posts: 1,964
Website

Re: Chromium hits Extra

defrysk wrote:

I like chromium, but google-chrome uses less resources so google-chrome is my preferred browser.

More details please. Chromium is just Chrome with a blue icon and without some tracking features.

Offline

#20 2009-12-17 08:57:53

hockeyfighter09
Member
Registered: 2009-07-04
Posts: 48

Re: Chromium hits Extra

guzz46 wrote:

Try using a different mirror, such as schlunix

Just tried this and I am still getting the same results as before.  Any other suggestions?

Offline

#21 2009-12-17 09:15:20

guzz46
Member
From: New Zealand
Registered: 2009-06-18
Posts: 190

Re: Chromium hits Extra

Did you do pacman -Syy first
or you could just download the package then do pacman -U

i686
http://www.schlunix.org/archlinux/extra … pkg.tar.gz

x86_64
http://www.schlunix.org/archlinux/extra … pkg.tar.gz

Offline

#22 2009-12-17 09:16:14

bangkok_manouel
Member
From: indicates a starting point
Registered: 2005-02-07
Posts: 1,556

Offline

#23 2009-12-17 09:16:56

Szelek
Member
From: Warsaw
Registered: 2008-09-03
Posts: 86

Re: Chromium hits Extra

https://users.archlinux.de/~gerbra/mirrorcheck.html

check if Your mirror is up-to-date.

Offline

#24 2009-12-17 09:42:01

hockeyfighter09
Member
Registered: 2009-07-04
Posts: 48

Re: Chromium hits Extra

All I got the package and did a pacman -U and it is installed now.  Thanks for everyone for the suggestions!  Any ideas what was wrong?  I did a pacman -Syy numerous times and kept getting the same result, weird.  Anyone know of a good reliable mirror that is updated frequently?  Is unixheads a good repo to use?

Offline

#25 2009-12-17 09:51:36

combuster
Member
From: Serbia
Registered: 2008-09-30
Posts: 711
Website

Re: Chromium hits Extra

Well depends on where you live, but French mirrors are often up to date, u could use rankmirror http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Imp … rankmirror
and then see on the web page that Szelek posted and see wich one is synced more recently...

unixheads were synced a month ago smile mirror.archlinux.no is syncing frequently also...

Last edited by combuster (2009-12-17 09:53:51)

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB