You are not logged in.

#1 2010-04-08 20:55:28

plutus
Member
Registered: 2010-03-20
Posts: 44

to hal or not to hal?

the new ubuntu 10.04 claims "Lucid Alpha 2 sports full removal of the hal  package, making Ubuntu faster to boot and faster to resume from suspend.   "

so...is it necessary to have hal?

Offline

#2 2010-04-08 21:02:12

loafer
Member
From: the pub
Registered: 2009-04-14
Posts: 1,772

Re: to hal or not to hal?

There's lots of discussion here:

http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=93958


All men have stood for freedom...
For freedom is the man that will turn the world upside down.
Gerrard Winstanley.

Offline

#3 2010-04-08 21:16:58

plutus
Member
Registered: 2010-03-20
Posts: 44

Re: to hal or not to hal?

thanks

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB