openoffice-base-devel broken

broch · 2010-04-12 00:38:41

/usr/bin/soffice-dev -writer
/usr/lib/openoffice-dev/program/soffice-dev.bin: error while loading shared libraries: libicuuc.so.42: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

installed /usr/lib/libicuuc.so.44

flamelab · 2010-04-12 00:41:08

Report it to bugs.archlinux.org where the devs will definitelly see this

broch · 2010-04-12 00:45:39

shrug,
I don't need your "help"

flamelab · 2010-04-12 00:46:39

Trolling is not your best asset.

broch · 2010-04-12 00:50:03

I don't really care what do you think. I did not ask for your "help"

If you don't know the solution then shut up. If you are bored take walk.

Allan · 2010-04-12 00:50:04

broch wrote:

shrug,
I don't need your "help"

It sure looks like you do... as you do not know how to report bugs. The link to the bug tracker is the solution.

broch · 2010-04-12 01:02:52

hmmm..
no,
this is stupid suggestion. Unless it is important what is the order of doing things? Hmm? I doubt it.
I posted problem here, if this is a bug I report it in bug tracker, What I do first (bug tracker or Arch forums does not matter.

If I would come here in a few hours asking why issue is not resolved, suggesting bugtracker would make sense.
I reported problem here I while logging to bugtracker I see already "suggestion" thanks, this is not a help.

Not to mention that I did not ask for help: I reported problem here (for users not reading bugtracker) and reported bug too.
So thank you very much.

Allan · 2010-04-12 01:26:14

What a load of crap. You reported the bug five minutes after my last post. So you only reported the bug after told to here. As already said, bug reported here are meaningless as the relevant dev is unlikely to see them.

broch · 2010-04-12 01:47:27

I don't see any point arguing with you. I was trying to get any openoffice to work, but none would load without error. I did not know that I should first file bug, or

Because I did report bugs before, I don't need you telling me what to do.

Look,
first one "helper" then you came to help him (or whatever you are trying to do).

I need openoffice, for work. As I mentioned I was trying to get any ooorg version to work while posting this here. If I new how stupid reaction posting problem here will cause I would skip this altogether.

Neither of you have anything to say about the issue, so ignore it.

Allan · 2010-04-12 02:05:56

broch wrote:

As I mentioned I was trying to get any ooorg version to work while posting this here.

Really? I have reread the entire thread and not once you mention anything other than the bug output. You do not ask for help in any form. My psychic ability is running a bit low these days...

If you had ask, I would have told you to use openoffice-base which is working currently. Both the openoffice-base-devel and -beta packages will be rebuilt once new releases are made (this week?).

broch · 2010-04-12 02:26:57

thank you very much for your great help.

I tried other versions of ooorg without your suggestion.

God, now semantics:

Really? I have reread the entire thread and not once you mention anything other than the bug output. You do not ask for help in any form. My psychic ability is running a bit low these days...

yes,
I was referring to the first line in my post #9.
line1)

I was trying to get any openoffice to work, but none would load without error.

and then

As I mentioned I was trying to get any ooorg version to work while posting this here.

refers to the first line
That is fantastic that you realized that I did not ask for help (and still I am not asking for it. Is this difficult to understand?)

Now, tell me kindly, how you helped? Why did you feel that your intervention is required?

I really did not expected even one response, because I was reporting issue here. But I got a bunch of irrelevant suggestions.

If I file bug first, or after trying something else first, that is absolutely not your decision to make.

that is all I hope

Pierre · 2010-04-12 03:50:56

openoffice-{devel,beta} are intentionally broken. According to the maintainer they are of very low usage anyway and new builds will arrive soon. (means: a bug report is not needed)

ngoonee · 2010-04-12 05:54:19

broch wrote:

I really did not expected even one response, because I was reporting issue here. But I got a bunch of irrelevant suggestions.
If I file bug first, or after trying something else first, that is absolutely not your decision to make.

They were telling you this is not the place to report issues. That's what a bug-tracker is for.

Please note, good manners and civility are assets, especially when speaking with those who know more than you.

tomk · 2010-04-12 09:49:29

broch - no doubt you will wish to argue with me too, but I can deal with that. The fact is that your first post in this thread is a bug report, and this forum is not the right place for bug reports. We have a dedicated bug tracker for that purpose. flamelab advised you of that in the second post, and when you ignored that advice, Allan repeated the suggestion.

The Arch dev team likes to receive bug reports from the community, and your contribution is appreciated. However, it needs to be made in the right place to be effective.

Finally, arguing with people who respond to your posts is not acceptable behaviour in this forum.

This thread is now closed. Please feel free to use the email link to the left if you would like to discuss this decision, or any other issues arising from this thread.

Arch Linux

#1 2010-04-12 00:38:41

openoffice-base-devel broken

#2 2010-04-12 00:41:08

Re: openoffice-base-devel broken

#3 2010-04-12 00:45:39

Re: openoffice-base-devel broken

#4 2010-04-12 00:46:39

Re: openoffice-base-devel broken

#5 2010-04-12 00:50:03

Re: openoffice-base-devel broken

#6 2010-04-12 00:50:04

Re: openoffice-base-devel broken

#7 2010-04-12 01:02:52

Re: openoffice-base-devel broken

#8 2010-04-12 01:26:14

Re: openoffice-base-devel broken

#9 2010-04-12 01:47:27

Re: openoffice-base-devel broken

#10 2010-04-12 02:05:56

Re: openoffice-base-devel broken

#11 2010-04-12 02:26:57

Re: openoffice-base-devel broken

#12 2010-04-12 03:50:56

Re: openoffice-base-devel broken

#13 2010-04-12 05:54:19

Re: openoffice-base-devel broken

#14 2010-04-12 09:49:29

Re: openoffice-base-devel broken

Board footer