You are not logged in.

#1 2005-03-16 09:30:11

antesoft
Member
From: France - Bretagne (Brittany)
Registered: 2005-03-16
Posts: 11
Website

[new] GnomeBaker v0.3

I made a GnomeBaker v0.3 package for Arch Linux 0.7.
You can download it here : http://www.antesoft.org/index_html/archlinux/


Philippe BERNERY
http://www.antesoft.org

Offline

#2 2005-03-16 10:22:07

JGC
Developer
Registered: 2003-12-03
Posts: 1,664

Re: [new] GnomeBaker v0.3

PKGBUILD? I'd like to add it to extra (it was on my todo list somewhere tongue)

Offline

#3 2005-03-16 11:43:09

antesoft
Member
From: France - Bretagne (Brittany)
Registered: 2005-03-16
Posts: 11
Website

Re: [new] GnomeBaker v0.3

Contributor: Philippe BERNERY <arch-linux-packager@antesoft.org>

pkgname=gnomebaker
pkgver=0.3
pkgrel=2
pkgdesc="Cd burning application for Gnome Desktop"
url="http://gnomebaker.sourceforge.net/"
license="LGPL"
depends=('gtk2' 'libgnome' 'libvorbis' 'libgnomeui')
source=(http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/gnomebaker/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.gz)
md5sums=('dd8276d35a0a3e31b3c16e136b079f83')

build() {
  cd $startdir/src/$pkgname-$pkgver
  ./configure --prefix=/opt/gnome
  make || return 1
  make DESTDIR=$startdir/pkg install
}

I'm a newbie in Arch Linux. Did I do the right things to make a package ?


Philippe BERNERY
http://www.antesoft.org

Offline

#4 2005-03-16 14:02:37

rensel
Member
From: Milan, Italy, Europe, Earth, S
Registered: 2004-06-20
Posts: 93
Website

Re: [new] GnomeBaker v0.3

Tell me when you put it into extra, so I can remove it from my TUR (I'm not interested in updating that package anymore...)


Arch GNU/Linux 0.7 Trusted User
"If I were more modest, I would be perfect"

Offline

#5 2005-03-17 08:18:24

JGC
Developer
Registered: 2003-12-03
Posts: 1,664

Re: [new] GnomeBaker v0.3

Package looks right, but you're missing the scrollkeeper part. Doesn't matter, since we're switching to a generic gnome scrollkeeper/gconf system at this moment (much faster, and more important: much cleaner on upgrades)

The gnomebaker thing is really shitty when it comes to makefiles: prefix=/opt/gnome, .desktop files come in /usr/share and the helpfiles are installed to /opt/gnome/share/help/gnomebaker/ where the generated config.h says that it's /opt/gnome/share/gnome/... sigh, inconsistency all over the place.

/me hacks around in the Makefiles to correct this issue.

Offline

#6 2005-07-17 09:59:42

samsara
Member
From: Edinburgh, UK
Registered: 2005-01-27
Posts: 16
Website

Re: [new] GnomeBaker v0.3

You can get the new version 0.4 by replacing the version number and md5sums of the pkgbuild found here:
http://cvs.archlinux.org/cgi-bin/viewcv … vsroot=AUR

Offline

#7 2005-07-17 13:10:49

iphitus
Forum Fellow
From: Melbourne, Australia
Registered: 2004-10-09
Posts: 4,927

Re: [new] GnomeBaker v0.3

JGC wrote:

Package looks right, but you're missing the scrollkeeper part. Doesn't matter, since we're switching to a generic gnome scrollkeeper/gconf system at this moment (much faster, and more important: much cleaner on upgrades)

The gnomebaker thing is really shitty when it comes to makefiles: prefix=/opt/gnome, .desktop files come in /usr/share and the helpfiles are installed to /opt/gnome/share/help/gnomebaker/ where the generated config.h says that it's /opt/gnome/share/gnome/... sigh, inconsistency all over the place.

/me hacks around in the Makefiles to correct this issue.

did someone say sed?

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB