You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I noticed a few kernel updates ago that linux-headers was no longer needed and could be removed! I did not remove it since I was not sure. I thought I would have read something here on the forums about it, but unless I missed it (which is possible) I don't see it being discussed.
I also manually searched for packages I could remove that were not needed and had no dependencies a few times over the past few weeks, and sure enough it still shows its not needed.
Can I remove it and why is it no longer needed?
Arch64, AMD64, LXDE
Offline
Are you sure you're not thinking about linux-api-headers? linux-headers were called kernel26-headers before linux 3 came.
linux-headers are needed by only a few packages, linux-api-headers however are required by glibc so you you still do need to have them installed.
Last edited by karol (2011-11-30 02:15:58)
Offline
Are you sure you're not thinking about linux-api-headers? linux-headers were called kernel26-headers before linux 3 came.
linux-headers are needed by only a few packages, linux-api-headers however are required by glibc so you you still do need to have them installed.
This is what I am looking at:
core/linux-headers 3.1.3-1
Last edited by banshee28 (2011-11-30 02:51:12)
Arch64, AMD64, LXDE
Offline
Sure. If you never need to compile an external kernel module, then linux-headers is not needed.
CPU-optimized Linux-ck packages @ Repo-ck • AUR packages • Zsh and other configs
Offline
Thanks everyone....I am also looking at the linux-ck packages now as well. Never knew they existed...
Arch64, AMD64, LXDE
Offline
Pages: 1