The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

SydMax · 2011-11-16 14:58:23

nous wrote:

Nothing is wrong with your system, I botched the PKGBUILD a little moving to the split package scheme. 3.1.1-6 which I just uploaded should be OK.

Could you update PKGBUILD in AUR, please? It is still 3.1.1-5.

nous · 2011-11-16 16:06:08

SydMax wrote:

nous wrote:
Nothing is wrong with your system, I botched the PKGBUILD a little moving to the split package scheme. 3.1.1-6 which I just uploaded should be OK.
Could you update PKGBUILD in AUR, please? It is still 3.1.1-5.

I did! There must have been some glitch that reverted the upload. I'll re-upload tonight when I get home, can't access my SSH box right now.

sxe · 2011-11-17 19:14:49

It works now. Thx for your work nous.

gee · 2011-11-18 04:39:16

The core2 and k8 packages have not been updated to 3.1.
Did you stop maintaining those? (I only care about core2 though).

Thanks

nous · 2011-11-19 23:01:25

gee wrote:

The core2 and k8 packages have not been updated to 3.1.
Did you stop maintaining those? (I only care about core2 though).

But they have, in both i686 and x86_64.

gee · 2011-11-20 00:02:01

I saw them today
Before they were still in previous version

kalpik · 2011-11-20 03:42:44

I cannot resume tuxonice on 3.1 I remember reading tuxonice was now built as a module? How do I load it in order to get it to work?

gee · 2011-11-20 20:29:09

When building aufs3-util against latest kernel I get this error:

In file included from ver.c:19:0:
/lib/modules/3.1-pf/build/include/linux/aufs_type.h:170:27: error: expected ‘:’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘}’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘*’ token

When searching for it online, I found this:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.f … .user/3241

which makes me think that there was an issue when the kernel sources were patched or something like that.

Anyone else getting this?

Last edited by gee (2011-11-20 20:41:23)

nous · 2011-11-20 20:51:49

kalpik wrote:

I cannot resume tuxonice on 3.1 I remember reading tuxonice was now built as a module? How do I load it in order to get it to work?

MODULES="... tuxonice_swap tuxonice_userui" in /etc/mkinitcpio.conf (userui being optional). Also, add 'resume' in HOOKS before 'filesystems'

[EDIT] Don't forget to run 'mkinitcpio linux-pf' afterwards.

Last edited by nous (2011-11-20 20:52:53)

el mariachi · 2011-11-21 21:13:14

what about those of us that do not use an initram?

nous · 2011-11-21 21:38:42

el mariachi wrote:

what about those of us that do not use an initram?

Well, we obviously configure the kernel ourselves when makepkg asks and change <M>'s to <*>'s at the relevant tuxonice options

If you've been running without an initrd, then you most certainly have configured already the kernel yourself, haven't you? I doubt any distro kernel would boot without it.

el mariachi · 2011-11-21 22:38:43

Now I see it was a dumb question.. yes I configure my own kernel. Moving on ..

f1st · 2011-12-01 08:40:56

Hi there, trying to update linux-pf from 3.1.2-1 to 3.1.3-1 i get the following error:

  LD [M]  drivers/media/dvb/mantis/hopper.ko
drivers/media/dvb/mantis/hopper.mod.o: file not recognized: File truncated
make[1]: *** [drivers/media/dvb/mantis/hopper.ko] Error 1
make: *** [modules] Error 2
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
    Aborting...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build linux-pf.

Any suggestions?

bangkok_manouel · 2011-12-01 09:09:04

f1st wrote:

Hi there, trying to update linux-pf from 3.1.2-1 to 3.1.3-1 i get the following error:

  LD [M]  drivers/media/dvb/mantis/hopper.ko
drivers/media/dvb/mantis/hopper.mod.o: file not recognized: File truncated
make[1]: *** [drivers/media/dvb/mantis/hopper.ko] Error 1
make: *** [modules] Error 2
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
    Aborting...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build linux-pf.

Any suggestions?

do you actually own this hardware? otherwise disable it.

f1st · 2011-12-01 10:05:48

bangkok_manouel wrote:

do you actually own this hardware? otherwise disable it.

Nope, but it's interesting what wrong with it. Last time I build all-inclusive kernel, and everything was fine.

linux-ka · 2011-12-01 11:43:15

hm, I cannot install it via pacman. your entry in pacman.conf:

[pfkernel]
Server = http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11734958/x86_64

is not available. Is there any alternative option? I do not want to compile a kernel now....

EDIT:

I have to correct my report, only linux-pdf is not reachable. The rest seams to be available.

Last edited by linux-ka (2011-12-01 11:45:44)

nous · 2011-12-01 22:29:55

f1st wrote:

Hi there, trying to update linux-pf from 3.1.2-1 to 3.1.3-1 i get the following error:

  LD [M]  drivers/media/dvb/mantis/hopper.ko
drivers/media/dvb/mantis/hopper.mod.o: file not recognized: File truncated
make[1]: *** [drivers/media/dvb/mantis/hopper.ko] Error 1
make: *** [modules] Error 2
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
    Aborting...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build linux-pf.

Any suggestions?

Dunno. I've built 3.1.3 errorlessly for all major CPUs.

nous · 2011-12-01 22:30:26

linux-ka wrote:

hm, I cannot install it via pacman. your entry in pacman.conf:
[pfkernel]
Server = http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11734958/x86_64
is not available. Is there any alternative option? I do not want to compile a kernel now....
EDIT:
I have to correct my report, only linux-pdf is not reachable. The rest seams to be available.

Fixed.

gee · 2011-12-03 21:53:41

gee wrote:

When building aufs3-util against latest kernel I get this error:
In file included from ver.c:19:0:
/lib/modules/3.1-pf/build/include/linux/aufs_type.h:170:27: error: expected ‘:’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘}’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘*’ token

When searching for it online, I found this:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.f … .user/3241
which makes me think that there was an issue when the kernel sources were patched or something like that.
Anyone else getting this?

Noone else getting this or using aufs?

kokoko3k · 2011-12-06 12:27:01

Anybody has an older version of this please?
I'm having several segmentation fault with 3.1.x, while they worked good with 3.0.x, and by mistake i deleted my packages.
I'm looking for precompiled or PKGBUILDS for *-atom

Thanks, hoping...

nous · 2011-12-06 13:04:42

kokoko3k wrote:

Anybody has an older version of this please?
I'm having several segmentation fault with 3.1.x, while they worked good with 3.0.x, and by mistake i deleted my packages.
I'm looking for precompiled or PKGBUILDS for *-atom
Thanks, hoping...

Get the latest package and edit the PKGBUILD as follows:

_minor=0
_pfrel=7

Then compile with 'makepkg --skipinteg'.

kokoko3k · 2011-12-06 15:04:51

Thanks nous, i thought at some problems with pachsets

Best_ · 2011-12-16 16:06:33

On my configured kernel some random processes shows up using ca 100000000000% cpu. What Kernel option do I need to stop this from happening?

nous · 2011-12-16 16:24:39

Best_ wrote:

On my configured kernel some random processes shows up using ca 100000000000% cpu. What Kernel option do I need to stop this from happening?

No kernel option should make that happen, it's most certainly a bug. Try a different CPU and/or I/O scheduler, timer freq (1000Hz is recommended by CK), disable debugging info...

aakos23 · 2011-12-25 13:01:11

:: Starting Open Sound System                                                                                           [BUSY] Relinking OSS kernel modules for "3.1-pf SMP preempt mod_unload modversions 686 "
This may take few moments - please stand by...
Relinking OSS kernel modules finished

Error: OSS driver modules do not match the current kernel

Kernel vermagic:  3.1-pf SMP preempt mod_unload modversions 686
OSS    vermagic:  3.1-pf SMP preempt mod_unload modversions ATOM

The most likely reason is that the kernel development package
installed in the system is wrong. Please refer to the documentation
of your Linux distribution for more info about setting up the
kernel/driver development environment properly.

                                                                                                                        [FAIL]

pfkernel/linux-pf-atom 3.1.6-1 (base)
pfkernel/linux-pf-core2 3.1.6-1 (base)

OSS not working.

Arch Linux

#276 2011-11-16 14:58:23

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

#277 2011-11-16 16:06:08

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

#278 2011-11-17 19:14:49

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

#279 2011-11-18 04:39:16

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

#280 2011-11-19 23:01:25

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

#281 2011-11-20 00:02:01

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

#282 2011-11-20 03:42:44

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

#283 2011-11-20 20:29:09

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

#284 2011-11-20 20:51:49

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

#285 2011-11-21 21:13:14

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

#286 2011-11-21 21:38:42

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

#287 2011-11-21 22:38:43

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

#288 2011-12-01 08:40:56

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

#289 2011-12-01 09:09:04

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

#290 2011-12-01 10:05:48

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

#291 2011-12-01 11:43:15

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

#292 2011-12-01 22:29:55

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

#293 2011-12-01 22:30:26

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

#294 2011-12-03 21:53:41

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

#295 2011-12-06 12:27:01

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

#296 2011-12-06 13:04:42

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

#297 2011-12-06 15:04:51

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

#298 2011-12-16 16:06:33

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

#299 2011-12-16 16:24:39

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

#300 2011-12-25 13:01:11

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

Board footer