You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
hidiehoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
which one is 'better' and why? x-org or the ATI-driver?
Last edited by b0b2 (2011-12-07 00:09:15)
Offline
Xorg is nor a driver it is the server that provides you a graphical interface: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Be … _Interface
You can either install the xf86-video-ati or the proprietary fglrx from the AUR. Depending on what you plan to use your system for will play a part in determining what driver you want to install.
Offline
i meant the xf86-video-ati of course.
but the question is: which driver is best for what purpose?
Offline
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ati
2 additional comments :
- Catalyst supports OpenGL 3 &4, oss driver stops at OpenGL 2.1 .
- Catalyst doesn't support KMS, on console you won't have the native resolution of your monitor.
Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.
clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky
Online
@Lone_Wolf
>> on console you won't have the native resolution of your monitor. << - you mean he cannot achieve this using uvesafb? -- I got uvesafb and native res (1920x1200) on the console and closed source drivers.
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Framebuffer
my 5c - I try proprietary drivers first, sometimes I am forced to downgrade to an older release, if still no positive results, I go with xf86's...
Last edited by paziul (2011-12-07 19:51:27)
"...and it probably never will support anything other than AT-harddisks..."
Offline
If OP goes catalyst driver, uvesafb is worth a try.
see https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Uvesafb for archlinux specific details.
there are however more advantages to KMs then just the native resolution used.
Last edited by Lone_Wolf (2011-12-07 23:17:57)
Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.
clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky
Online
Pages: 1