unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

student975 · 2012-01-13 15:10:08

graysky wrote:

@student and krum - my bad, fixed now in 3.2.1-2 which is building now. Expect it live in ~3 h.

Got it, thanks!

"student" and "student975" are very different, btw.. Similar to "agent" and "agent007"

SanskritFritz · 2012-01-13 15:16:32

student975 wrote:

"student" and "student975" are very different, btw.. Similar to "agent" and "agent007"

This just proves you are not a bot

graysky · 2012-01-13 19:54:19

stefanwilkens wrote:

I did mean BFS

According to CK, benchmarking these differences is difficult since we're talking about latency and desktop feel. Once ck1 is out, we'll see about it.

spreadtux · 2012-01-17 12:16:27

Welcome Back BFQ !!! Thx Graysky

stefanwilkens · 2012-01-18 23:42:37

http://ck-hack.blogspot.com/2012/01/32-ck1.html

P.S. What this really means is I finished playing zelda.

Grabbing the PKGBUILDS and compiling with a few changes for my box, cheers for maintaining this.

Last edited by stefanwilkens (2012-01-19 00:02:42)

vwyodajl · 2012-02-10 10:26:04

sorry for dumb question time, but I am trying to see what the difference between the ck and ck-corex builds are. Is there a config file for corex that I seem unable to find? I tried dling the corex package but did not seem to be able to find the config in there.
Thanks

graysky · 2012-02-10 20:40:12

@vw - Check the wiki page for some general details about these differences. As to the specific config file from within the package, I don't know if it is stored in there somehow or not. A simple search reviled nothing so it could be compressed somewhere.

find -type f -print0 | xargs -0 grep -i --color=auto CONFIG_SCHED_BFS

To your specific question, here is the x86_64 config for 3.2.5-1 for the corex package.

vwyodajl · 2012-02-10 20:43:57

Awesome thank you for the response and help graysky. Thanks for your hard work as well

dodo3773 · 2012-02-14 21:32:36

I cannot seem to update today

nvidia-ck-corex: requires nvidia-utils=290.10

I use linux-ck-corex and also the regular linux for fallback.

graysky · 2012-02-14 21:38:03

@dodo - This is just one of those times when the devs release an update when I'm away from my workstation and unable to respond with the repo packages. Anyway, all flavors of nvidia-ck have been updated to 295.20-1 which are online now. Just 'pacman -Syu' and enjoy!

Also, thank you for the post!

dodo3773 · 2012-02-14 22:20:21

graysky wrote:

@dodo - This is just one of those times when the devs release an update when I'm away from my workstation and unable to respond with the repo packages. Anyway, all flavors of nvidia-ck have been updated to 295.20-1 which are online now. Just 'pacman -Syu' and enjoy!
Also, thank you for the post!

Thank you graysky.

mumpf · 2012-02-15 16:58:49

Would my wlan pci adapter ralink rtl8185 be supported by linux-ck-kx (I have an athlon XP 2700+ with 1.5 gb ram) the same way the standard kernel supports it?
Where would I have or feel a difference (office and browsing) with the linux-ck-kx?

graysky · 2012-02-15 21:37:29

@mumpf - See the linux-ck wiki page for info. In short, everything supported by the ARCH kernel is supported by the ck kernel package. As to the feel difference, install it and tell us

Maki · 2012-02-21 17:11:08

I use arch 32 bit on AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2, is the kx kernel a 64 bit kernel that can work in 32bit userland or just a plaint 32 bit kernel?

graysky · 2012-02-21 17:44:22

Kx is available in both 32 and 64 bit builds. Not sure I am understanding your question.

JokerBoy · 2012-02-21 17:48:38

Maki wrote:

I use arch 32 bit on AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2, is the kx kernel a 64 bit kernel that can work in 32bit userland or just a plaint 32 bit kernel?

it works just fine with 32bit userland.

Last edited by JokerBoy (2012-02-21 17:49:00)

Maki · 2012-02-21 17:51:39

graysky wrote:

Kx is available in both 32 and 64 bit builds. Not sure I am understanding your question.

I was wondering is the kx kernel a 64 kernel with 32 bit userland support, i know some distros install a 64 bit kernel when you boot the 32 bit install cd on a suitable arch.

I have opened https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=136263 opened a thread here.

Maki · 2012-02-21 17:53:41

JokerBoy wrote:

Maki wrote:
I use arch 32 bit on AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2, is the kx kernel a 64 bit kernel that can work in 32bit userland or just a plaint 32 bit kernel?
it works just fine with 32bit userland.

You use the 64 bit repo-ck repo on arch32?

JokerBoy · 2012-02-21 18:28:40

No, I used linux-bfs 64bit kernel with 32bit userland but it's the same thing. But now I'm now back at pure 64bit, since you can't use virtualbox with a 64bit kernel and 32bit userland.

syne · 2012-02-22 02:03:49

Upgraded to 3.2.7 and was thrown into a recovery shell after reboot.

mount: Unknown filesystem 'ext2'

I understand that supposedly ext4 should mount now both ext3 and ext4 filesystems, but when i tried to mount my ext4 partition it gave the same error. Luckily kept the mainstream kernel as well, so I downgraded ck.

Am I overlooking something here?

Meyithi · 2012-02-22 02:10:32

syne wrote:

Upgraded to 3.2.7 and was thrown into a recovery shell after reboot.
mount: Unknown filesystem 'ext2'
I understand that supposedly ext4 should mount now both ext3 and ext4 filesystems, but when i tried to mount my ext4 partition it gave the same error. Luckily kept the mainstream kernel as well, so I downgraded ck.
Am I overlooking something here?

https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/28569?p … &sort=desc

also

http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/ … 22587.html

darehanl · 2012-02-22 04:12:59

Good thing I was paying attention to pacman's output for once. I noticed this line

cp: warning: source file `./lib/modules/3.2.7-2-ck/kernel/fs/ext4/ext4.ko.gz' specified more than once

and dropped in to check. @graysky, I guess these packages track [testing]?

falconindy · 2012-02-22 05:00:14

darehanl wrote:

Good thing I was paying attention to pacman's output for once. I noticed this line
cp: warning: source file `./lib/modules/3.2.7-2-ck/kernel/fs/ext4/ext4.ko.gz' specified more than once
and dropped in to check. @graysky, I guess these packages track [testing]?

Harmless...

graysky · 2012-02-22 20:27:36

darehanl wrote:

@graysky, I guess these packages track [testing]?

@darehanl - for bugfix releases to the kernel, they do track [testing]. This problem is fixed -- are you still experiencing it?

https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/28569

Last edited by graysky (2012-02-22 20:28:05)

falconindy · 2012-02-22 20:38:41

FS#28569 is unrelated to the cp warning. Please fix your config to avoid the warning.

Arch Linux

#701 2012-01-13 15:10:08

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#702 2012-01-13 15:16:32

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#703 2012-01-13 19:54:19

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#704 2012-01-17 12:16:27

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#705 2012-01-18 23:42:37

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#706 2012-02-10 10:26:04

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#707 2012-02-10 20:40:12

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#708 2012-02-10 20:43:57

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#709 2012-02-14 21:32:36

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#710 2012-02-14 21:38:03

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#711 2012-02-14 22:20:21

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#712 2012-02-15 16:58:49

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#713 2012-02-15 21:37:29

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#714 2012-02-21 17:11:08

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#715 2012-02-21 17:44:22

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#716 2012-02-21 17:48:38

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#717 2012-02-21 17:51:39

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#718 2012-02-21 17:53:41

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#719 2012-02-21 18:28:40

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#720 2012-02-22 02:03:49

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#721 2012-02-22 02:10:32

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#722 2012-02-22 04:12:59

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#723 2012-02-22 05:00:14

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#724 2012-02-22 20:27:36

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

#725 2012-02-22 20:38:41

Re: unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

Board footer