You are not logged in.

Pages: 1 … 14 15 16 17 18 … 34

Topic closed

#376 2012-03-24 18:26:02

nous
Member
From: Across the Universe
Registered: 2006-08-18
Posts: 323
Website

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

From 3.2.7-2 onwards the headers package will follow the kernel package naming convention, i.e. for linux-pf-core2 the matching headers will be linux-pf-headers-core2. I decided to make this change after seeing a few complaints about precompiled 3rd party modules (like nvidia) from the [pfkernel] repo, which sometimes fail to load on different CPUs. Hopefully, by next weeked I'll provide the corresponding nvidia-pf-[cpu] in the repo, after I modify my build script to correctly use the nvidia-pf PKGBUILD for that purpose.

systemd-free.artixlinux.org

Offline

#377 2012-03-26 19:11:17

sergiuniculescu
Member
From: Romania
Registered: 2011-04-17
Posts: 32
Website

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

Why when I run 'make localmodconfig' it doesn't recognize the processor type? I have to select it manually in 'kernel configuration options before build'.

The box said Windows XP or better. So I installed Linux.

Offline

#378 2012-03-28 11:59:37

nous
Member
From: Across the Universe
Registered: 2006-08-18
Posts: 323
Website

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

sergiuniculescu wrote:

Why when I run 'make localmodconfig' it doesn't recognize the processor type? I have to select it manually in 'kernel configuration options before build'.

It's intentional, many people don't want cpu-optimized kernels.

systemd-free.artixlinux.org

Offline

#379 2012-03-28 13:49:48

nous
Member
From: Across the Universe
Registered: 2006-08-18
Posts: 323
Website

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

The 3.2.7-2 PKGBUILD has a glitch that makes the headers package conflict with the kernel one; please just install linux-pf[-cpu] and ignore the headers one for the time being; the previous headers files are exactly the same (for that matter, even the linux-pf package is exactly the same, so you can safely ignore the update).

3.2.7-3 is in the AUR and the issue is resolved, and it's still functionally the same as -1. Just ignore them all, until Oleksandr releases 3.3.

Last edited by nous (2012-03-28 14:14:12)

systemd-free.artixlinux.org

Offline

#380 2012-03-29 11:33:01

broken pipe
Member
Registered: 2010-12-10
Posts: 243

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

not 'really' relevant but an annoying side effect, i'm running several kernels on this machine and i keep track of the loaded modules.
when i execute ifconfig, the appletalk module gets loaded

http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/ … 21281.html

Last edited by broken pipe (2012-03-29 12:13:46)

Offline

#381 2012-03-29 11:50:46

nous
Member
From: Across the Universe
Registered: 2006-08-18
Posts: 323
Website

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

broken pipe wrote:

not 'really' relevant but an annoying side, i'm running several kernels on this machine and i keep track of the loaded modules.
when i execute ifconfig, the appletalk module gets loaded

http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/ … 21281.html


What if you blacklist it in /etc/modprobe.d/modprobe.conf?

systemd-free.artixlinux.org

Offline

#382 2012-04-03 05:39:50

sergiuniculescu
Member
From: Romania
Registered: 2011-04-17
Posts: 32
Website

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

I got this error with 3.2.7-4:

==> Starting package_linux-pf-headers()...
cp: cannot stat `include/aufs3': No such file or directory
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package_linux-pf-headers().
Aborting...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build linux-pf.

The box said Windows XP or better. So I installed Linux.

Offline

#383 2012-04-03 07:31:27

Lockheed
Member
Registered: 2010-03-16
Posts: 1,527

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

sergiuniculescu wrote:

I got this error with 3.2.7-4:

==> Starting package_linux-pf-headers()...
cp: cannot stat `include/aufs3': No such file or directory
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package_linux-pf-headers().
Aborting...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build linux-pf.

Yeah, everyone and their dog is getting that one.

Offline

#384 2012-04-03 15:39:59

travnick
Member
From: Poland
Registered: 2011-04-24
Posts: 75

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

PowerTOP suggest to enable CONFIG_NOTIFY in kernel because of all the time file checking (or sth like this)

Offline

#385 2012-04-04 09:34:35

nous
Member
From: Across the Universe
Registered: 2006-08-18
Posts: 323
Website

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

Sorry guys, 3.2.7-4 was a working draft for 3.3 and was uploaded by mistake. 3.2.7-3 still is the latest and greatest.

travnick: There's no such option as CONFIG_NOTIFY in kernel config. Are you sure about the message from powertop?

systemd-free.artixlinux.org

Offline

#386 2012-04-04 12:30:42

Cdh
Member
Registered: 2009-02-03
Posts: 1,098

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

powertop has been showing this for quite some time (2+ years I believe). It's probably a bug in powertop.

฿ 18PRsqbZCrwPUrVnJe1BZvza7bwSDbpxZz

Offline

#387 2012-04-04 15:26:51

travnick
Member
From: Poland
Registered: 2011-04-24
Posts: 75

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

That's interesting ;] I'll test it on default arch kernel

Offline

#388 2012-04-04 16:34:17

Zom
Member
From: Sweden
Registered: 2007-10-27
Posts: 430

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

travnick wrote:

PowerTOP suggest to enable CONFIG_NOTIFY in kernel because of all the time file checking (or sth like this)

Actually, I think it asks for CONFIG_INOTIFY, which is probably already enabled. It's not called that anymore though, IIRC, it's CONFIG_INOTIFY_USER now.

Offline

#389 2012-04-05 20:02:30

dontbugme
Banned
Registered: 2011-11-04
Posts: 166
Website

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

I'm trying to install aufs3-util from AUR. I already added 

export CPPFLAGS="-I /usr/src/linux-$(uname -r)/include"

in the build() of the PKGBUILD. But still, I only receive an error: 

/usr/src/linux-3.2-pf/include/linux/aufs_type.h:179:27: error: expected ‘:’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘}’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘*’ token

during the make process.
According to the README of aufs3-util I'm supposed to execute a make headers_install in the Linux source (/usr/src/linux-$(uname -r)/). (Something which could theoretically be added to the linux-pf{,-headers} PKGBUILD, I suppose.) But this only yields the following: 

  CHK     include/linux/version.h
/usr/src/linux-3.2-pf/scripts/Makefile.headersinst:14: /usr/src/linux-3.2-pf/include/Kbuild: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/src/linux-3.2-pf/include/Kbuild'.  Stop.
make: *** [headers_install] Error 2

There seems to some missing files in the linux-headers-pf(-k8 for me).

Last edited by dontbugme (2012-04-05 20:04:05)

Offline

#390 2012-04-05 21:43:22

nous
Member
From: Across the Universe
Registered: 2006-08-18
Posts: 323
Website

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

dontbugme wrote:

I'm trying to install aufs3-util from AUR. I already added 

export CPPFLAGS="-I /usr/src/linux-$(uname -r)/include"

in the build() of the PKGBUILD. But still, I only receive an error: 

/usr/src/linux-3.2-pf/include/linux/aufs_type.h:179:27: error: expected ‘:’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘}’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘*’ token

during the make process.
According to the README of aufs3-util I'm supposed to execute a make headers_install in the Linux source (/usr/src/linux-$(uname -r)/). (Something which could theoretically be added to the linux-pf{,-headers} PKGBUILD, I suppose.) But this only yields the following: 

  CHK     include/linux/version.h
/usr/src/linux-3.2-pf/scripts/Makefile.headersinst:14: /usr/src/linux-3.2-pf/include/Kbuild: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/src/linux-3.2-pf/include/Kbuild'.  Stop.
make: *** [headers_install] Error 2

There seems to some missing files in the linux-headers-pf(-k8 for me).

Please download linux-pf from the AUR and edit the PKGBUILD at around line 66 as follows:

#        rm -f include/linux/Kbuild
        mkdir -p "${pkgdir}/usr/src/linux-${_kernver}/include"
        mv include/linux/Kbuild "${pkgdir}/usr/src/linux-${_kernver}/include/"
        cd ..

Then makepkg as normal, install the resulting linux-pf-headers-k8 and retry building aufs3-util. I don't use aufs3 at all...

systemd-free.artixlinux.org

Offline

#391 2012-04-06 18:18:28

Lockheed
Member
Registered: 2010-03-16
Posts: 1,527

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

Once again, after upgrade the kernel won't boot. It just casually stops the boot process at that:

Fri Apr  6 20:01:00 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mAdjusting system time and setting kernel timezone^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:00 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mStarting UDev Daemon^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:00 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mTriggering UDev uevents^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:00 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mLoading User-specified Modules^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m WARNING: Module vboxdrv not found.
Fri Apr  6 20:01:00 2012: libkmod: kmod_module_insert_module: could not find module by name='phc_intel'
Fri Apr  6 20:01:00 2012: ERROR: could not insert 'phc_intel': Function not implemented
Fri Apr  6 20:01:00 2012: WARNING: Module tp_smapi not found.
Fri Apr  6 20:01:00 2012: WARNING: Module thinkpad_ec not found.
Fri Apr  6 20:01:00 2012: ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[31mFAIL^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:00 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mWaiting for UDev uevents to be processed^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m udevd[131]: error opening ATTR{/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1a.0/usb3/3-2/3-2:1.0/power/
Fri Apr  6 20:01:00 2012: 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:00 2012: udevd[131]: error opening ATTR{/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1a.0/usb3/3-2/3-2:1.0/power/control} for writing: No such file or directory
Fri Apr  6 20:01:00 2012: 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:00 2012: ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:00 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mBringing up loopback interface^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:00 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mUnlocking encrypted volumes:^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:00 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mChecking Filesystems^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m arch: clean, 415441/1050576 files, 3579556/4194973 blocks
Fri Apr  6 20:01:00 2012: D: clean, 285985/17530880 files, 64898660/70091587 blocks
Fri Apr  6 20:01:00 2012: ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:00 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mRemounting Root^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:00 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mMounting Local Filesystems^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:00 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mActivating Swap^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[31mFAIL^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:00 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mConfiguring Time Zone^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:00 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mInitializing Random Seed^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:00 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mRemoving Leftover Files^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:01 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mSetting Hostname: panzor^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:01 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mSetting Consoles to UTF-8 mode^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[%G^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:01 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mLoading Keyboard Map: pl^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:01 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mSaving dmesg Log^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:01 2012: INIT: Entering runlevel: 3
Fri Apr  6 20:01:01 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mStarting syslog-ng^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[35mBKGD^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:01 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mStarting D-BUS system messagebus^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:03 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mStarting acpid^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:04 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mStarting laptop-mode^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:06 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mStarting Up Sensors^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:06 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mStarting HDDTemp^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:06 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mMounting Network Filesystems^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:06 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mStarting crond^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[35mBKGD^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:06 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mStarting wicd Daemon^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:09 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mRestoring ALSA Levels^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:10 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mStarting Simple Login Manager^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:11 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mStarting hdapsd^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m 
Fri Apr  6 20:01:11 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mStarting bluetooth subsystem:^[[0;10m ^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[36mBUSY^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m ^[[u^[[0;10m^[[1m bluetoothd^[[0;10m^[[s^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1mDONE^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[
Fri Apr  6 20:01:12 2012: ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m:: ^[[0;10m^[[1mStarting cpufreq^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[35mBKGD^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m

Also, do I have to compile nvidia driver manually now? nvidia-pf doesn't run on kernel 3.3

Last edited by Lockheed (2012-04-06 18:19:56)

Offline

#392 2012-04-06 20:34:59

nous
Member
From: Across the Universe
Registered: 2006-08-18
Posts: 323
Website

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

Lockheed wrote:

Once again, after upgrade the kernel won't boot. It just casually stops the boot process at that:

^[[0;10m^[[1mStarting cpufreq^[[0;10m ^[[71G   ^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m[^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[35mBKGD^[[0;10m^[[1m^[[34m]^[[0;10m

Also, do I have to compile nvidia driver manually now? nvidia-pf doesn't run on kernel 3.3

It boots fine here... and nvidia-pf compiles fine if you edit the PKGBUILD for 3.3; I'm compiling now the various modules for the repo.

systemd-free.artixlinux.org

Offline

#393 2012-04-07 18:41:10

Lockheed
Member
Registered: 2010-03-16
Posts: 1,527

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

Lockheed wrote:
nous wrote:
Lockheed wrote:

After adding that to MODULES array, instead of the usual text messages upon hibernation (missing the % part), I am getting this:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/29 … 42948.jpg/

Try commenting out the following in your /etc/hibernate/common.conf:

UnloadBlacklistedModules yes
EnableVbetool yes
RestoreVbeStateFrom /var/lib/vbetool/vbestate
VbetoolPost yes
RestoreVCSAData yes

I thought that's going to solve it, but not so. Now the screen goes blank for a second, and comes back to the desktop without hibernating.

Getting back to the issue, I discovered something I did not notice before:
During bootup, I can see this:

Activating Swap    [BUSY]    [FAIL]

which is strange, as TUX does write the image to the swap.

Offline

#394 2012-04-07 19:31:31

lkraav
Member
Registered: 2011-04-08
Posts: 37

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

so as of 3.3.1 it seems i've run out of mount flags in include/linux/fs.h, trying to combine vserver-2.3.3.2 and 3.3.1-pf. vserver takes 1<<25..1<<27 and toi wants 1<<25. there's no room left to move either. i don't use TOI, so can you smart guys throw some suggestions on what to do with this? vserver developer suggested patching the whole mount flags to a 64bit variable, but i dont have enough to pull that change off. i was thinking i could just do

#define MS_FROZEN   SOME_RANDOM_VALUE /* Frozen by freeze_filesystems() */

since it's not actually going to be used. or i guess ripping out TOI from pf is an option?

EDIT: turns out i have been running with the same thing on 3.0.7 with no issue at all for months, so I guess I will simply keep the flag.

Last edited by lkraav (2012-04-07 19:52:42)

Offline

#395 2012-04-07 21:29:36

nous
Member
From: Across the Universe
Registered: 2006-08-18
Posts: 323
Website

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

Lockheed wrote:

Getting back to the issue, I discovered something I did not notice before:
During bootup, I can see this:

Activating Swap    [BUSY]    [FAIL]

which is strange, as TUX does write the image to the swap.

Is the swap partition actually active when boot completes? I've had some times in the past my swap partitions corrupted by TOI and I had to mkswap/swapon them.

systemd-free.artixlinux.org

Offline

#396 2012-04-08 12:01:24

Lockheed
Member
Registered: 2010-03-16
Posts: 1,527

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

nous wrote:
Lockheed wrote:

Getting back to the issue, I discovered something I did not notice before:
During bootup, I can see this:

Activating Swap    [BUSY]    [FAIL]

which is strange, as TUX does write the image to the swap.

Is the swap partition actually active when boot completes? I've had some times in the past my swap partitions corrupted by TOI and I had to mkswap/swapon them.

Ok, I fixed that but now it is the same story (except after changes to config files you suggested I can't see % progress any more during hibernation and upon resume). Resume looks like this:
- disk read
- 30 second break
- beep, screen flashes black
- 30 second break
- beep
- 30 second break
- beep
- system resumes to desktop

Offline

#397 2012-04-08 19:02:26

post-factum
Member
From: /cz
Registered: 2008-09-12
Posts: 152
Website

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

lkraav wrote:

so as of 3.3.1 it seems i've run out of mount flags in include/linux/fs.h, trying to combine vserver-2.3.3.2 and 3.3.1-pf. vserver takes 1<<25..1<<27 and toi wants 1<<25. there's no room left to move either. i don't use TOI, so can you smart guys throw some suggestions on what to do with this? vserver developer suggested patching the whole mount flags to a 64bit variable, but i dont have enough to pull that change off. i was thinking i could just do

#define MS_FROZEN   SOME_RANDOM_VALUE /* Frozen by freeze_filesystems() */

since it's not actually going to be used. or i guess ripping out TOI from pf is an option?

EDIT: turns out i have been running with the same thing on 3.0.7 with no issue at all for months, so I guess I will simply keep the flag.

I tried to apply vserver myself. Consider using 256, 512, 1<<26 and 1<<27.

uname == latest pf-kernel

Offline

#398 2012-04-08 22:44:28

gee
Member
Registered: 2006-11-29
Posts: 313

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

Hey nous, what would you think of including zcache as part of this kernel?
Anyone ever tried it? It seems interesting technology.

Offline

#399 2012-04-09 17:19:55

nous
Member
From: Across the Universe
Registered: 2006-08-18
Posts: 323
Website

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

gee wrote:

Hey nous, what would you think of including zcache as part of this kernel?
Anyone ever tried it? It seems interesting technology.

It's already there (in staging), along with zram.

Last edited by nous (2012-04-09 17:23:45)

systemd-free.artixlinux.org

Offline

#400 2012-04-09 17:36:39

el mariachi
Member
Registered: 2007-11-30
Posts: 595

Re: The linux-pf thread; BFS/CK, TuxOnIce, BFQ, AUFS3

have any of you used it? I have 3Gb of ram and only rarely do I use more than 1Gb, so I feel like I'm not benefiting from it at all

Offline

Pages: 1 … 14 15 16 17 18 … 34

Topic closed

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB