You are not logged in.
Couldn't fit this in the title, but halfway through my last pacman -Syu, there was a notification for low space on root partition. I guess I was just being foolish when I ignored it, but after I restarted it, the screen is.. well.. look at it: http://i.imgur.com/7hj8D.png
Not evident in the screenshot is that all I can see is up to the url bar and the bottom inch is just black.
So what's happening here? I'm not exactly sure what happened or how to describe it, so it's hard to search for my problem. If anyone at least can tell me what it looks like did not work properly I can look for other threads.
I'm using a Fujitsu Lifebook T-1010 and using xf-86 intel video. More useful information: when updating (it's been a couple weeks since my last system update) I had issues with updating libgl (required for xf86-video-intel and others), and the best advice I could get from forums is to ignore it when updating.
Thanks.
Last edited by werdnanoslen (2012-04-09 01:57:53)
Offline
Couldn't fit this in the title, but halfway through my last pacman -Syu, there was a notification for low space on root partition. I guess I was just being foolish when I ignored it, but after I restarted it, the screen is.. well.. look at it: http://i.imgur.com/7hj8D.png
Not evident in the screenshot is that all I can see is up to the url bar and the bottom inch is just black.So what's happening here? I'm not exactly sure what happened or how to describe it, so it's hard to search for my problem. If anyone at least can tell me what it looks like did not work properly I can look for other threads.
I'm using a Fujitsu Lifebook T-1010 and using xf-86 intel video. More useful information: when updating (it's been a couple weeks since my last system update) I had issues with updating libgl (required for xf86-video-intel and others), and the best advice I could get from forums is to ignore it when updating.
Thanks.
1.What issues? What does your pacman.log say about that update?
Offline
1.What issues? What does your pacman.log say about that update?
Currently:
$ sudo pacman -Syu
:: Synchronizing package databases...
core is up to date
extra is up to date
community is up to date
archlinuxfr is up to date
:: Starting full system upgrade...
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: mach64-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2
:: mga-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2
:: r128-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2
:: savage-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2
:: sis-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2
:: tdfx-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2However:
$ sudo pacman -S libgl
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: ati-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2
:: intel-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2
:: mach64-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2
:: mga-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2
:: r128-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2
:: savage-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2
:: sis-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2
:: tdfx-dri: requires libgl=7.11.2Last edited by werdnanoslen (2012-04-08 01:21:06)
Offline
Offline
Yes, that's the one everything I can find links to, and there are two suggestions there: ignore it when you upgrade (what I did) or "you don't need those". Problem is I do:
$ whoneeds libgl
Packages that depend on [libgl]
cheese
empathy
eog-plugins
evince
gdm
gnome-color-manager
gnome-documents
gnome-games
gnome-games-extra-data
gnome-session
gnome-shell
gnome-tweak-tool
google-talkplugin
mesa
mesa-demos
mutter
processing
sushi
totem
vlc
xf86-video-ati
xf86-video-intel
xf86-video-vmware
xorg-utils
xscreensaverLast edited by werdnanoslen (2012-04-08 01:26:35)
Offline
Are you able to remove it(libgl) from Ignorepkg and upgrade to newer version?
Last edited by hadrons123 (2012-04-08 01:27:37)
Offline
Are you able to remove it(libgl) from Ignorepkg and upgrade to newer version?
Of course, and no. What you see posted above is after I removed it from my ignore list.
Also, my display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller
Last edited by werdnanoslen (2012-04-08 01:32:56)
Offline
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1041870 maybe this might help.
Offline
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1041870 maybe this might help.
Close, but I have an Intel card, not nVidia. Mine: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller
Offline
The thread is not about nvidia. Its about libgl .
Offline
The thread is not about nvidia. Its about libgl .
Sorry, all I'm gleaning from that thread is that the guy should remove non-nvidia drivers and dri packages, and then install the utils package that includes its own libgl implementation. As far as I can tell from updating either libgl or the drivers is that in my case, this does not happen.
Last edited by werdnanoslen (2012-04-08 01:46:51)
Offline
Remove your non intel and dri packages.
Offline
Remove your non intel and dri packages.
I removed xf86-video-ati. That's the only other video driver I had (can't remember why, did have a reason in the past). No change.
Offline
hadrons123 wrote:Remove your non intel and dri packages.
I removed xf86-video-ati. That's the only other video driver I had (can't remember why, did have a reason in the past). No change.
What do you mean by 'no change'? Have you removed tdfx-dri etc. too?
Offline
Alright, I took a risk and removed all the -dri's (as seen here) and I'm now back to normal. I was hesitant to do this, as another similar situation cropped up some time ago and deleting video drivers as suggested led to a week of work. Learning process it may have been, I am very hesitant about that now, as I'm using an older laptop that isn't so interested in 100% compliance with most new stuff.
Also, by "Remove your non intel and dri packages" I read that as "Remove your non intel and non-dri packages." So that post was the right way to go after all. Thanks ![]()
Last edited by werdnanoslen (2012-04-09 02:01:25)
Offline